The Statesman discovers Robert Morrow
Ken Herman has a story today about Mr. Morrow’s efforts to dig up dirt about Rick Perry. This includes a full-page ad in the Austin Chronicle soliciting information about Perry’s personal behavior earlier in his career. Readers of this space will recognize Mr. Morrow’s name. He is a frequent commenter on the blog, usually about subjects so bizarre and so scandalous that I am forced to send them to trash rather than publish them. He is convinced that the JFK assassination was a massive conspiracy. Once he posted a list of the 50 best books about the assassination. One of his bete noirs is George H. W. Bush, who allegedly had a hand in some dark deed that I have forgotten. Had my e-mail not been hacked a couple of months ago, I would be able to restore some of those posts. Mr. Morrow is a libertarian and a supporter of Ron Paul. Most of his submissions to the blog are not publishable. He doesn’t have much credibility, IMO. but he is relentless about stirring up the rumor mill.
Tagged: rick perry, Robert Morrow, rumor mill
roadgeek says:
Wasn’t his ad published 10 days ago? And Ken Herman is just now getting around to discussing this?
Scary, given that the AA-S is ostensibly the newspaper of record here in Austin.
Reply »
Hilarious Reply:
August 28th, 2011 at 3:55 pm
Honestly, given that this isn’t news at all anyway, the Statesman and Herman are stretching their own credibility writing about it at all. At least in PB’s case here, readers are familiar with the craziest of Austin’s wingnuts, left or right.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 2:58 am
You, “Hilarious” are just a Rick Perry flack. Who cares what you think? I post with my real name unlike you. So what is holding you back? Can’t speak for yourself.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
December 25th, 2011 at 8:10 pm
Two words for you “Hilarious:” Glen Maxey. http://gawker.com/5868489/all-your-rick-perry-gay-sex-rumors-collected-in-one-handy-book
The truth on Rick Perry is stranger and more disturbing than fiction.
Reply »
The House is Not a Home says:
Well the ad was in the Austin Chronicle, which has about as much credibility as Burnt Orange Report.
Reply »
Aren Cambre says:
This is too funny. He’s stirred up the same crap on the Republican Liberty Caucus of Texas email group (RLCTX is libertarian-leaning Republicans–I’m admittedly a fence sitter on this group). I asked him to produce verifiable facts, and yet again, all he can produce is “friend saw this” or “friend of a friend” nonsense.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 3:54 am
Aren, you start with things called “leads,” then you work your way to primary sources. It is a two part process: 1) finding primary resources then 2) getting them to talk.
Ask any reporter – both of those things are hard to do. I know primary sources … but they will not talk (yet) for obvious reasons.
Reply »
WhiteRA says:
a nut ball with a laptop is a dangerous thing in today’s world.
Reply »
Truman Sparks Reply:
August 28th, 2011 at 4:59 pm
But most of them have First Amendment protection for being in the press….
Reply »
Blue Reply:
August 28th, 2011 at 8:10 pm
There is no “First Amendment protection for being in the press.” There is a general First Amendment protection for all citizens.
Reply »
Truman Sparks Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 7:12 pm
Really? Please read New York Times v Sullivan and the text of the amendment. They both make it very clear that the press has special protection under the first amendment, particularly when commenting on public officials.
Blue Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 8:23 pm
Nonsense. The actual malice standard applies for all who comment about public persons, regardless of press affiliation. There is no special right to criticize possessed by members of “the press”, whatever that group might be assessed to be. Sullivan talks about “publication”, not about “the press.” The notion that some persons possess a special level of speech protection based upon their employment (as recognized by the State, of course) is anathema to a democratic society.
Reply »
Charlie Adaway says:
JBB isn’t dangerous! How dare you!
Reply »
Casual Observer says:
“I don’t think a rumor can just get to critical mass by itself,” Perry said. “I think you have to have a well thought-out, organized effort to disseminate that kind of information and keep it going day after day after day after day.”
… or, there is some meat to the rumor and that’s why people are talking? Wasn’t there a certain state representative who served with Perry who mentioned first-hand knowledge of an encounter?
I think the ad by Morrow is ridiculous, but so is just about everything that Perry says… In the end (and I do not mean anything by that), Morrow is basically harmless to all except Perry… Perry is harmful to all except himself.
Given Perry’s stance regarding doctor/patient relationship – okay for him to do what he thinks best for his health, but not for women who might need to terminate a pregnancy -why isn’t it okay to see what else Perry is hypocritical about?
Reply »
Robert Morrow says:
A few quick points:
1) Of course, the JFK assassination was a LBJ-CIA, Texas oil man coup d’etat. That is where hte cutting edge JFK research has led us. Here is one little nugget:
Madeleine Duncan Brown was a mistress of Lyndon Johnson for 21 years and had a son with him named Steven Mark Brown in 1950. Madeleine mixed with the Texas elite and had many trysts with Lyndon Johnson over the years, including one at the Driskill Hotel in Austin, TX, on New Year’s Eve 12/31/63.
In the early morning of January 1, 1964, just 6 weeks after the JFK assassination, Madeleine asked Lyndon Johnson:
“Lyndon, you know that a lot of people believe you had something to do with President Kennedy’s assassination.”
He shot up out of bed and began pacing and waving his arms screaming like a madman. I was scared!
“That’s bull___, Madeleine Brown!” he yelled. “Don’t tell me you believe that crap!”
“Of course not.” I answered meekly, trying to cool his temper.
“It was Texas oil and those f____g renegade intelligence bastards in Washington.” [said Lyndon Johnson, the new president.] [Texas in the Morning, p. 189] [LBJ told this to Madeleine in the late night of 12/31/63 in the Driskill Hotel, Austin, TX in room #254. They spent New Year’s Eve ‘64 together here. Room #254 was the room that LBJ used to have rendevous’ with his girlfriends – today it is known as the LBJ Room, and rents for $600-1,000/night as a Presidential suite at the Driskill; located on the Mezzanine Level.]
Here are some top of line books on the 1963 Coup d’Etat:
1 LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination Phillip F. Nelson
2 JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters James Douglass
3 Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years David Talbot
4 Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America Russ Baker
5 The Dark Side of Camelot Seymour Hersh
6 The Tatum Chronicles (Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus” for free on internet! Extremely important!) D. G. “Chip Tatum”
7 The Final Chapter on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Craig Zirbel
8 The Texas Connection Craig Zirbel
9 The Men Who Killed Kennedy – the Guilty Men DVD, episodes 7,8,9 on YouTube Nigel Turner
10 Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J Killed J.F.K. Barr McClellan
11 The Dark Side of Lyndon Baines Johnson Joachim Joesten
12 The Immaculate Deception: The Bush Crime Family Exposed Russell S. Bowen
13 Texas in the Morning: The Love Story of Madeleine Brown and President Lyndon Baines Johnson Madeleine Brown
14 JFK – Director’s Cut – 2 Disc Special Edition (1991) Oliver Stone
15 Defrauding America: Encyclopedia of Secret Operations by the CIA, DEA and Other Covert Agencies Rodney Stich
16 Bloody Treason: On Solving History’s Greatest Murder Mystery: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy Noel H. Twyman
17 ILLUSION AND DENIAL in the John F. Kennedy Assassination Noel H. Twyman
18 Conspiracy: Who Killed President Kennedy? Anthony Summers
19 The Last Investigation Gaeton Fonzi
20 Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald Judyth Vary Baker & Edward Haslam
21 Oswald and the CIA John Newman
Reply »
Robert Morrow says:
As for George Herbert Walker Bush… I hold him in very low esteem. Basically, he has been involved in a slew of dirty CIA dealings for decades.
So maybe Burka will not delete this post. It is not like I am the only one who thinks very little of GHW Bush or has huge problems with the way the man has behaved.
1) A lot of JFK researchers, though not all, think CIA GHW Bush was involved in the JFK Assasination. See Russ Baker – Family of Secrets. Surely, you folks have heard about that seminal book?
2)Then there is the 1980 election and the Republicans making a deal with the Iranians to hold the American hostages until after the election. I interviewed Adm. Bobby Ray Inman a few years ago and he told he had “no doubt” the Republicans, especially William Casey, made a deal with the Iranians. If true, that is treason.
Let me repeat that: Bobbie Inman said he had NO DOUBT the Republicans made a deal with the Iranians. Should be common knowledge now, the Iranian principals spoke out on this a long time ago.
3) 1992 election. Bush-Clinton-Perot – a lot of under the surface, very dirty dealings were going on in that campaign, especially in the Bush and Clinton camps. Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus” and you will learn the full story. Chip Tatum was an elite CIA counterintelligence agent and assassin who worked directly under GHW Bush. As for the Clintons, they were using private detectives to run terror campaigns on Bill’s women.
4) Everytime I talk about GHW Bush and the Franklin Scandal, Burka deletes it. How about INSTEAD reading 2 books?: The Franklin Cover Up by John De Camp (1992) and the Franklin Scandal by Nick Bryant (2009). Nick Bryant deserves a Pulitzer Prize for nailing down this story of a 1980′s pedophile ring that was running at the elite levels of the Republican party. Go to You Tube and watch the video “Conspiracy of Silence.”
5) An excellent book on Jeb Bush is The Conspirators: Confessions of an Iran Contra Insider. Oliver North and Jeb Bush come off very, very bad in that book.
I learned most of these things in the past 6 years or so, beginning while I was doing deep research on the Clintons. If you study the Clintons, you will learn a LOT about the Bushes, because they are tied at the hip with the 1980′s Iran-Contra scandal. Bill Clinton was recruited into the CIA in 1968 while he was at Oxford and informing to the government on all his anti-war buddies.
Based on what I know about the Bushes, I would vote for Hillary Clinton over any Bush running: Jeb, GHW Bush, GWB, any of them.
The Bushes are literally several rungs below the Clintons, if that is possible. I learned most of these things AFTER I had voted for GWB in 2000 and 2004.
Reply »
Robert Morrow says:
As for Rick Perry … I am the president of CASH -the Committee Against Sexual Hypocrisy. The key word in that name is “hypocrisy.” Rick Perry is guy who was autographing Bibles in South Carolina 2 weeks ago; he uses the “Living Christ” adhortations for political gain. He has hopped in bed with a high school gymnasium full of extremist preachers Hagee, the AFA, etc. that would literally imprison every homosexual in America, close down every strip club, ban all forms of pornography including Playboy. Not to mention harsh penalties for sodomy, prostitution and gambling and drug use.
That is the agenda Rick Perry pushes (in general) and those are the folks he is in bed with politically. Rick Perry supports criminalizing sodomy and is opposed to Lawrence v. Texas, saying he liked the underlying law. (I opposed L v. Texas, but also oppose the underlying law.)
So we are taking a look at Rick Perry’s life and see how it stacks up with all the Bible-thumping, anti-gay agenda, not to mention his support of the $5 pole tax as well as the bill he signed into law that made multiple convictions of prostitution a FELONY for the first time EVER in Texas and thus offenders are eligble for state prison (in Texas we never used to send our hookers to state prison.)
So, folks ask, how are all the investigations into Perry going so far? We have a lot of secondary sources that indicate that Perry may not always square up with his public political agenda and the agenda of his fervid Christian base supporters.
And we are getting closer to finding primary sources on Rick’s behavior. As reporters should know, it is very hard to get primary sources to go on the record. It takes time to find them; it takes time for reporters to gain their trust and convince them to tell their story.
Remember, when Bill Clinton ran for president in 1992, he had literally and without exaggeration been with HUNDREDS of women. Only 2 stepped forward: Sally Perdue and Bobbie Ann Williams. Gennifer Flowers was outed by a tabloid and only then did she sell her story to another one for $50,000. Carville, Begala, Stephanopolous, Hillary, Bill ran a very cynical 1992 campaign the whole way through: lying, denying and if that didn’t working getting the private detectives to run a terror campaign. They got a slew of women to lie under oath and sign false affidavits saying they had absolutely no dealings with that crazed sex monkey Bill Clinton.
The Clinton team even got Juanita Broaddrick who Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton raped twice in one setting in April 1978, biting her lip to disable her, … they even got rape victim Broaddrick to lie under oath and sign a false affidavit and say she had no dealings/experiences with Bill Clinton.
People’s capacity to lie and do dirty things grows exponentially when they are in a presidential campaign. Except Ron Paul, of course.
So it is damn hard to get primary sources to go public. But it’s possible … stay tuned!
Reply »
Can't Trust Comboverers Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 12:40 pm
As jack Nicholson said in one of his movies. “I’m sorry were not buying any crazy today.
Reply »
Dr Amie Calvin says:
I’m living with someone just like Robert Morrow. Some people just need attention and thrives on it. They will say and do just about anything to get some attention. If you ignore them they will try even harder to get your attention. If you ridicule them they love it. They love putting others down, if makes them feel important.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
That says more about you than the person you are STILL living with …
Reply »
Texian Politico says:
I read that story yesterday, too. I wonder why Ken Herman didn’t mention the fact that Morrow believes George H.W. Bush was running a global prostitution ring of underaged girls? He’s gone into great detail about it on this blog. Also, why didn’t he also describe how Morrow gets uncomfortably close when he talks to someone? The other items missing in this story are the close ties between Morrow and Don Zimmerman, the former state rep candidate that is now the SREC member for most of Travis Co and Morrow’s connection to the guy in the creepy north Austin apartment that greeted the Statesman reporter at the door with a knife.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 1:53 pm
Texian Politico – now let’s get your facts straight. And I would appreciate if Mr. Burka would not delete this so I may at least respond to the comment above.
In the 1980′s there was a Franklin pedophile ring being run out of Omaha, NE by an infamous Lawrence E. King, a man who actually sang the national anthem at the 1984 Republican convention.
King was a big 300 lb black man and a very key Republican insider. He was also a notorious pedophilic pimp to certain GOP elites as well as a child pornographer. King was friends with GHW Bush, Jack Kemp, William Casey, certain Supreme Court Justices, Clarence Thomas (not yet on court), Warren Buffet (Democrat) and the elite of Omaha, including Harold Andersen, the publisher of the Omaha World Herald.
GHW Bush’s name became involved in 1986 when a young girl – still alive today at age 41 – told Nebraska CPS that she saw GHW Bush paying Lawrence E. King at a party in Chicago for the time and services of an 18 year old black male gay prostitute named Brandt Thomas.
Read the book The Franklin Cover Up by John de Camp or google “George Bush Brandt Thomas.”
After King was arrested in 1988 for embezzling $40 million from the Franklin bank where he was the bank manager, a huge cover up ensued over the massive pedophile ring he was running. The pedophile ring catering mainly to homosexual men was the real story, not the embezzlement.
GHW Bush, his Justice Dept and the FBI were the key players in the cover up, which was quite savage and probably … someone probably blew up the airplane of invesigator Gary Caradori in July, 1990. He was returning from Chicago in his private plane, having secured smoking gun evidence of photos given to him by the photographyer Rusty Nelson of the pedophile/child ppornography ring.
So I have never said GHW Bush was running a prostitution ring of young girls. Instead, I am saying GHW Bush is a longtime homosexual pedophile, who was a client of the Franklin pedophile ring, and that Bush and his Justice Dept savagely covered up this scandal.
Re: GHW Bush, I have confirmed his behavior by speaking with Ray Hill (age 70) of Houston, a long time gay activist who told me what Bush was up to in the late 1960′s when he was a congressman. I told Ken Herman about Ray Hill and he immediately knew who he was – big player in the gay community in Houston.
I would appreciate it if Mr. Burka would leave this post up, to give me the courtesy of being able to reply to the above post.
Reply »
Cow Droppings Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 3:35 pm
“So I have never said GHW Bush was running a prostitution ring of young girls. Instead, I am saying GHW Bush is a longtime homosexual pedophile, who was a client of the Franklin pedophile ring, and that Bush and his Justice Dept savagely covered up this scandal.”
Thanks for clearing that up. I already feel better about our 41st president.
Reply »
Bodhisattva Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 6:37 pm
You lost me when you tried to use “black man” and “key Republican insider” in the same sentence. Even Alan Keyes, a former GOP presidential candidate, and Michael Steele, a former RNC chair, have never been mistaken for “key Republican insiders.”
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 7:17 pm
Google “Lawrence E. King Franklin Scandal” and you will learn a lot. King sang the national anthem at the 2004 Republican National Convention in Dallas, TX.
At the time, King was running a notorious pedophile ring often catering to the GOP elite, businessmen, and media elite.
King is a free man today; he went to jail for about 5 years for embezzlement at the Franklin Credit Union where he was branch manager; King lost a $1 million lawsuit to Paul Bonacci, one of his teenage child prostitute victims.
King was never convicted of any child abuse crimes, because the corrupted government covered the scandal up due to the high level players.
Google is your friend; you will learn a lot:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Lawrence+E.+King+Franklin+Scandal&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&oe=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=792&bih=427
Anonymous says:
Extremely curious to me that the Press gives Perry a passing grade on his Christian “sincerity.” Given how little he’s given to his church through the years, and his obviously low ethical standards (e.g., funneling money to his campaign thru RGA and trading appointments and corporate welfare for campaign donations), the Press version of Christian sincerity must be awfully low. Political ethics (if you can call them that) may be one thing, but when you start running as a model Christian, you ought to be held to the higher standard you’re purporting to embrace. (Or is the Press right, and Perry’s behavior is now what passes for the model of Christian ethics and sincerity?)
Reply »
Vincent Bugliosi says:
Robert,
In your list of books you forgot “Harvey & Lee: How the CIA Framed Oswald”, by John Armstrong.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 1:55 pm
That book is 1/2 great research and 1/2 baloney. I don’t buy the 2 Oswalds theory.
Oswald, however, was certainly US intelligence and he probably shot NO ONE on 11/22/63.
Reply »
Vincent Bugliosi Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 3:01 pm
You should also read David Lifton’s work on how they snatched the President’s body and altered it to where it only looked like he was shot from the back.
Oswald was totally CIA. Uneducated, antisocial, no money, no steady job, no permanent residence, unwilling to accept authority. Textbook CIA.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 4:10 pm
No question, Oswald was CIA. And he shot no one, although he may very well have been involved in the plot in some way.
Check out his summer 1963 reading list – he was reading 4 Ian Fleming James Bond books and anti-communist writers such as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn! Doesn’t sound like a commie to me.
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=17255
In reality, Oswald was a low level US intelligence agent whose fake public persona was that of a pro-Castro Marxist. In reality he was an ex-Marine, a fake defector to Russia, an US spy … and ultimately the fall guy for the JFK assasination while the LBJ-CIA-Texas oil men murderers ran free. Hoover, LBJ’s close friend, was probably involved as well.
Vincent Bugliosi Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 6:28 pm
It’s amazing how all these people in the military, CIA, Secret Service etc. were able to kill JFK with such execution and not have the plot leak out after all these years. I mean, there must have been hundreds of people involved.
And the government normally can’t do anything right, let alone keep a secret for five seconds.
Texian Politico Reply:
August 30th, 2011 at 9:14 am
Morrow,
Why did the oilmen want JFK killed? In what way was LBJ different from JFK? JFK was already pushing action in Vietnam and LBJ pushed the Great Society, the Civil Rights Act, etc. I don’t see much difference between the two besides style. Besides, the conservative oilmen would have been Coke Stevenson men years before, not LBJ backers. LBJ was never seen as a conservative Democrat like Allan Shivers, but rather more moderate or even liberal.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
December 25th, 2011 at 8:26 pm
JFK was in no way shape or form like LBJ, except in the department of rampant womanizing.
The Kennedy brothers were ready to drop LBJ from the ticket and also take away the Texas oil men’s “oil depreciation allowance.” Those 2 things alone were reason for H.L. Hunt and Clint Murchison, Sr. to murder JFK.
JFK was at times a hawk in rhetoric, but in reality he was a dove, dove, dove. McNamera and McGeorge Bundy have both said that JFK was not wanting to go into Vietnam. I think Bundy may have been involved in the JFK asssassination, certainly the cover up.
As VP, Johnson was doing everything he could to sabotage JFK on Vietnam (siding with the hawks) Civil Rights (LBJ head of the EEOC and doing nothing). The 1964 Civil Rights Bill was LBJ’s get out of jail ticket for the JFK assassination. He had to give the liberals something; many of them suspected LBJ in the JFK assassination.
From that point on LBJ took care of:
1) himself ( no indictment in the Bobby Baker scandal)
2) the Texas oil men
3) CIA military who wanted the Vietnam War. He did not give them an invasion of Cuba though. Public opinion did not support that.
4) Hoover – who LBJ made FBI director for life, exempting his neighbor of 19 years from mandatory retirement on 1/1/65 when Hoover turned age 70.
Read Dallek’s book on LBJ. Shivers accused LBJ of killing a man in prison – Sam Smithwick over the Box 13 scandal. Basically to shut him up. Shivers later became a prominent LBJ supporter for president. That tells you a lot of how people bow down to power.
Murchison, Sr. and ultra rightist H.L. Hunt were huge LBJ supporters – not because they gave a hoot about the Great Society – but because LBJ buttered their bread immensely on oil industry issues and tax breaks.
Crazy Uncle says:
I rather have a hypocritical christian than a hypocritical socialist.
Reply »
Jed Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 2:04 pm
you’d rather have someone who is not really a christian than someone who is not really a socialist?
wow, me too!
Reply »
Anonymous Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 3:30 pm
I’m inclined to say that being a hypocrite and being a Christian are mutually exclusive, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding.
Reply »
anita says:
I don’t believe much of what Mr. Morrow says, but it’s his right — as it is mine to disregard his opinion.
But one aspect of Ken Herman’s piece gives me trouble — his fixation on the size and value of Morrow’s home. It just seems odd to me that this has anything to do with the subject at hand. If he were discussing tax breaks, or his own personal fincial interests, sure — but his efforts seem to have nothing to do with furthering his own financial interests.
Reply »
Texian Politico Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 1:48 pm
I think that is Herman’s polite way of letting us know that Morrow lives a very comfortable life off of mommy and daddy’s money and doesn’t have a job of his own. The part about how he lives alone in a huge home is also his attempt to let us know that Morrow doesn’t have a spouse or partner.
I heard once from someone that had been in Morrow’s home that he had a lot of toys in it for small children. Not sure what that means, if anything. Thought I’d just throw it out there Robert Morrow-style.
Reply »
texun says:
And it is curious at best that Herman didn’t tell his readers that Morrow wears tassel loafers! That’s all you need to know about Morrow, folks. Read: Buster Brown, The Tassel Loafer Conspiracy (2010)and H. D. Tige, What Do the Tassels Hide? (2011).
Reply »
Texian Politico Reply:
August 30th, 2011 at 9:18 am
HAHA!!
Reply »
paulburka says:
Okay, readers, that’s enough of Robert Morrow for tonight. I usually send his comments to trash. I will make an exception this time. Readers need to digest the things Morrow is saying. I’m going to let his post stand this time, but I am not going to let him run wild with rumors.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 29th, 2011 at 7:10 pm
Good. Because people ask me questions, I then give them a straight answer, and in the past it is often deleted.
I often study a lot of deep politics; things that are not allowed in the MSM because they are too radioactively true.
Reply »
Texian Politico Reply:
August 30th, 2011 at 9:24 am
Morrow,
Can you share with everyone your close ties to Don Zimmerman, the SREC member for most of Travis County? Does he agree with what you have found in your research? What does he think about George H.W. being a homosexual pedophile, LBJ conspiring to kill JFK, and the secret CIA plot to silence Ron Paul?
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
August 30th, 2011 at 1:03 pm
Texian, as Ronald Reagan used to say, “there you go again” with your diversionary tactics. I have never said the CIA was out to get Ron Paul; but that is okay if you want to “just make stuff up” out of thin air.
And isn’t it kind of obvious in the year 2011 that the JFK assassination was a coup d’etat? What kind of a rock have you been hiding under to not be able to figure that one out? By the way, Mark Lane has a new book coming out this fall that indicts the CIA.
I don’t know if Don Zimmerman thinks if George Herbert Walker Bush is a homosexual pedophile involved with the Franklin Scandal.
Perhaps you could ask him? It sure seems that it gets under your skin that Don Zimmerman is on the SREC. You don’t like Zimmerman; why is that? Are you some sort of a statist? I know you are too chicken to post your real name. There is power in being able to publicly state what you think.
roadgeek says:
Thank you, Paul. Thank you oh so much for allowing Mr. Morrow the time and space to post his facts. My wife and I both had a hard day at work and we needed the laugh. It was wonderful.
Reply »
Dawn Meredith says:
Very sad and ignorant group here. Robert Morrow may be weird, and I am the first to admit that BUT what he has posted is the truth. Do some damn research people. But no that takes time…easier to have a laugh. Or just be dismissive.
Ya, irnorance is bliss.
Dawn Meredith
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
December 25th, 2011 at 8:35 pm
Liking hot, sexy women with big boobs is not weird, its normal.
If you want weird google “Rick Perry precious little Craigslist adventures.”
Now that is *weird.*
TO ROBERT MORROW, FROM PAUL BURKA
Robert — You have received e-mails from Texas Monthly warning you to respect the rules of the blog if you wish you have your comments published. You have continued to ignore our warnings. You may not post comments containing rumors and innuendos about public officials. If you continue to post such comments, they will be sent to trash.
Reply »
Concerned Citizen says:
Dawn Meredith is an incompetent attorney from Austin TX that lives off our legal system as a public defender. Beware to all the poor folks that get stuck with this moron as their attorney.
“irnorance is bliss”? So is getting drunk and mis spelling your anti government rantings.
Tell the folks how the Government deals illegal drugs. Then tell the folks how you’ve consumed those illegal drugs over the years.
Dawn Meredith should be disbarred.
Reply »
Robert Morrow Reply:
December 25th, 2011 at 8:33 pm
Hey *Concerned Citizen* – how about putting your name on your posts? At times the government has often dealt drugs on a gargantuan scale. Google “George Bush CIA drug smuggling” or “Oliver North CIA drug smuggling.” Ditto the Clintons.
And there many people in America who use illegal drugs in USA, Texas, Austin, including a very highly place politician who you probably support politically.
I can name several recent and alive US presidents who were into cocaine or marijuana. Google is your friend – CIA controlled MSM won’t let you know.
Reply »
Concerned Citizen Reply:
April 20th, 2012 at 10:25 pm
You know Morrow you remind me of Lurch from the 1960′s TV series “Adams Family”, except you’re not as smart.
Keep masturbating to the same tune. You Princeton homosexuals are led by the traitorous “Aaron Burr”, the British assassin of Alexander Hamilton.
You, your family are all traitors. Keep your face in the porn magazines and out of the JFK murder.
What a creep you are.
Reply »
Dawn Meredith Reply:
October 28th, 2012 at 6:19 pm
I am Dawn Meredith and the person posting the lies about me above is a creep who has not ever met me
and knows zero about my life. He came to my attention in 2004 by slandering my good friend Carl Oglesby who died last year. Of course I defended Carl and the creep- Jim Harwood is his name- learned I was an atty because I signed a post that way. He is a devotee of the LaRouche cult and hates me. He is not permitted to post on any political forums becasue the owners all know he is a wack job.
Only cowards post lies under the cover of a pretend “concerned citizen”. I busted his ass around the time he made this post as he was posting under someone else’s name and picture.
_
Reply »
Dawn Meredith Reply:
November 5th, 2012 at 2:19 pm
I arrivied in my office late today to see an attack on a forum of my close friend of now 32 years, Carl Oglesby. I was just floored. This guy does not know Carl, this is 100% clear from his cogent but totally erononous and libelous attack and it causes me to wonder:WHO is this guy? Why is he here??
Answer this to me Mr Harwood: What gives you the right to just make a personal attack on a man whom you have never had one conversation? Pass ugly judgement and write libelous and ugly worlds about his work and his person???
Only a cowdard does such a thing. Someone truly with an axe to grind.
This is not an invitation to a fight. You could never win it sir as I have the truth on my side. So defend away, I won’t respond further. Lies may anger me but ultimately bore me.
Get a life perhaps???
Attorney Dawn Meredith
Reply »
Dawn Meredith Reply:
November 5th, 2012 at 2:26 pm
The above post was made by me in Jan 05, my first interaction with this creature. Later he would send me emails saying I should be disbarred. Of course I blocked him.
Theresa C. Mauro says:
Whomever is posting these fallacious remarks about Dawn Meredith has no business spreading falsehoods about people they don’t even know, or have never even met. Especially, when a person’s reputation and livelihood are being bandied about the internet at random with slanderous remarks such as this.
Reply »
Dawn Meredith says:
From John Simkin: owner of said forum and what started all of this.
Posted 14 January 2005 – 06:31 AM
Jim Harwood has been trying to become a member of this Forum for sometime. I have of course read his ridiculous posts on JFK Lancer and was reluctant to accept him as a member. Not because I disagreed with his views but because he seemed totally irrational and that he appeared to go out of his way to upset people.
Before he could join I said he had to send me a photograph and a biography so that I could check to find out who he really was. He has of course refused to do that. Unfortunately I now get a daily email concerning the conspiracy to kill JFK.
Reply »