Burkablog

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Neil Armstrong, R.I.P.

I was saddened to hear of the death of astronaut Neil Armstrong, at 82. His passing reminds us of a time when people still believed that government could do great things. Nobody believes that any more. The landing on the moon is one of the great accomplishments of this nation, or any nation, in the history of humankind, and it came at a difficult moment in our history. The Vietnam war was still raging, a war based on the mistaken premise that if Vietnam fell to the communists, all of southeast Asia would follow. America was still struggling with the promise of civil rights as its cities endured summers of rioting. And, of course, we suffered through the terrible assassinations of the era.

I remember reading what Time wrote (though not verbatim) about the moon landing: “When the Viet Nam war is just a footnote to history, the date July 20, 1969, will still be remembered around the world.” That was the right perspective. We earthlings had defeated gravity.

* * * *

I was in Rice Stadium on September 12, 1962–my senior year–when John F. Kennedy came to Houston to give his “Moon Speech,” about his plan to land a man on the moon before the end of the decade. The Cuban Missile crisis lay just weeks ahead. The Vietnam conflict was just starting to make the news. Martin Luther King’s March on Washington was a year away. Though few of us suspected it, Texas lay on the cusp of enormous change. NASA would bring to Houston a cachet it had never dreamed of. Unseen thousands of people in the northern tier of states were gathering to descend on Texas. A state that was primarily rural in character was about to discover the suburb, with all the immense political and social changes that would follow.  The political group that dominated state politics–conservative Democrats–would soon find themselves pinched to the point of extinction between Republicans and liberal Democrats. The new Texas that lay just beyond the horizon would bring liquor by the drink, Southwest Airlines, the Dallas Cowboys, women at Texas A&M, the silicon chip, and thousands upon thousands of immigrants from across the Rio Grande. Houston itself would soon be the nation’s fourth largest city.

I’m going to publish JFK’s “Moon Speech” below, as a memorial to Neil Armstrong, because it speaks to the way Americans viewed the future in those days. It is a great speech, one that encapsulates all of recorded history and seeks to set it in the history of our own time. Unlike today’s politicians, Kennedy spoke to our best impulses as a nation, not our worst.

* * * *

President Pitzer, Mr. Vice President, Governor, Congressman Thomas, Senator Wiley, and Congressman Miller, Mr. Webb, Mr. Bell, scientists, distinguished guests, and ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate your president having made me an honorary visiting professor, and I will assure you that my first lecture will be very brief.

I am delighted to be here, and I’m particularly delighted to be here on this occasion.

We meet at a college noted for knowledge, in a city noted for progress, in a State noted for strength, and we stand in need of all three, for we meet in an hour of change and challenge, in a decade of hope and fear, in an age of both knowledge and ignorance. The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds.

Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation’s own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.

No man can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 years of man’s recorded history in a time span of but a half-century. Stated in these terms, we know very little about the first 40 years, except at the end of them advanced man had learned to use the skins of animals to cover them. Then about 10 years ago, under this standard, man emerged from his caves to construct other kinds of shelter. Only five years ago man learned to write and use a cart with wheels. Christianity began less than two years ago. The printing press came this year, and then less than two months ago, during this whole 50-year span of human history, the steam engine provided a new source of power.

Newton explored the meaning of gravity. Last month electric lights and telephones and automobiles and airplanes became available. Only last week did we develop penicillin and television and nuclear power, and now if America’s new spacecraft succeeds in reaching Venus, we will have literally reached the stars before midnight tonight.

This is a breathtaking pace, and such a pace cannot help but create new ills as it dispels old, new ignorance, new problems, new dangers. Surely the opening vistas of space promise high costs and hardships, as well as high reward.

So it is not surprising that some would have us stay where we are a little longer to rest, to wait. But this city of Houston, this State of Texas, this country of the United States was not built by those who waited and rested and wished to look behind them. This country was conquered by those who moved forward–and so will space.

William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage.

If this capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not, and it is one of the great adventures of all time, and no nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in the race for space.

Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it–we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace. We have vowed that we shall not see space filled with weapons of mass destruction, but with instruments of knowledge and understanding.

Yet the vows of this Nation can only be fulfilled if we in this Nation are first, and, therefore, we intend to be first. In short, our leadership in science and in industry, our hopes for peace and security, our obligations to ourselves as well as others, all require us to make this effort, to solve these mysteries, to solve them for the good of all men, and to become the world’s leading space-faring nation.

We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.

There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation many never come again. But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

It is for these reasons that I regard the decision last year to shift our efforts in space from low to high gear as among the most important decisions that will be made during my incumbency in the office of the Presidency.

In the last 24 hours we have seen facilities now being created for the greatest and most complex exploration in man’s history. We have felt the ground shake and the air shattered by the testing of a Saturn C-1 booster rocket, many times as powerful as the Atlas which launched John Glenn, generating power equivalent to 10,000 automobiles with their accelerators on the floor. We have seen the site where the F-1 rocket engines, each one as powerful as all eight engines of the Saturn combined, will be clustered together to make the advanced Saturn missile, assembled in a new building to be built at Cape Canaveral as tall as a 48 story structure, as wide as a city block, and as long as two lengths of this field.

Within these last 19 months at least 45 satellites have circled the earth. Some 40 of them were “made in the United States of America” and they were far more sophisticated and supplied far more knowledge to the people of the world than those of the Soviet Union.

The Mariner spacecraft now on its way to Venus is the most intricate instrument in the history of space science. The accuracy of that shot is comparable to firing a missile from Cape Canaveral and dropping it in this stadium between the the 40-yard lines.

Transit satellites are helping our ships at sea to steer a safer course. Tiros satellites have given us unprecedented warnings of hurricanes and storms, and will do the same for forest fires and icebergs.

We have had our failures, but so have others, even if they do not admit them. And they may be less public.

To be sure, we are behind, and will be behind for some time in manned flight. But we do not intend to stay behind, and in this decade, we shall make up and move ahead.

The growth of our science and education will be enriched by new knowledge of our universe and environment, by new techniques of learning and mapping and observation, by new tools and computers for industry, medicine, the home as well as the school. Technical institutions, such as Rice, will reap the harvest of these gains.

And finally, the space effort itself, while still in its infancy, has already created a great number of new companies, and tens of thousands of new jobs. Space and related industries are generating new demands in investment and skilled personnel, and this city and this State, and this region, will share greatly in this growth. What was once the furthest outpost on the old frontier of the West will be the furthest outpost on the new frontier of science and space. Houston, your City of Houston, with its Manned Spacecraft Center, will become the heart of a large scientific and engineering community. During the next 5 years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration expects to double the number of scientists and engineers in this area, to increase its outlays for salaries and expenses to $60 million a year; to invest some $200 million in plant and laboratory facilities; and to direct or contract for new space efforts over $1 billion from this Center in this City.

To be sure, all this costs us all a good deal of money. This year’s space budget is three times what it was in January 1961, and it is greater than the space budget of the previous eight years combined. That budget now stands at $5,400 million a year–a staggering sum, though somewhat less than we pay for cigarettes and cigars every year. Space expenditures will soon rise some more, from 40 cents per person per week to more than 50 cents a week for every man, woman and child in the United States, for we have given this program a high national priority–even though I realize that this is in some measure an act of faith and vision, for we do not now know what benefits await us.

But if I were to say, my fellow citizens, that we shall send to the moon, 240,000 miles away from the control station in Houston, a giant rocket more than 300 feet tall, the length of this football field, made of new metal alloys, some of which have not yet been invented, capable of standing heat and stresses several times more than have ever been experienced, fitted together with a precision better than the finest watch, carrying all the equipment needed for propulsion, guidance, control, communications, food and survival, on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and then return it safely to earth, re-entering the atmosphere at speeds of over 25,000 miles per hour, causing heat about half that of the temperature of the sun–almost as hot as it is here today–and do all this, and do it right, and do it first before this decade is out–then we must be bold.

I’m the one who is doing all the work, so we just want you to stay cool for a minute. [laughter]

However, I think we’re going to do it, and I think that we must pay what needs to be paid. I don’t think we ought to waste any money, but I think we ought to do the job. And this will be done in the decade of the sixties. It may be done while some of you are still here at school at this college and university. It will be done during the term of office of some of the people who sit here on this platform. But it will be done. And it will be done before the end of this decade.

I am delighted that this university is playing a part in putting a man on the moon as part of a great national effort of the United States of America.

Many years ago the great British explorer George Mallory, who was to die on Mount Everest, was asked why did he want to climb it. He said, “Because it is there.”

Well, space is there, and we’re going to climb it, and the moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God’s blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked.

President Pitzer, Mr. Vice President, Governor, Congressman Thomas, Senator Wiley, and Congressman Miller, Mr. Webb, Mr. Bell, scientists, distinguished guests, and ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate your president having made me an honorary visiting professor, and I will assure you that my first lecture will be very brief.

I am delighted to be here, and I’m particularly delighted to be here on this occasion.

We meet at a college noted for knowledge, in a city noted for progress, in a State noted for strength, and we stand in need of all three, for we meet in an hour of change and challenge, in a decade of hope and fear, in an age of both knowledge and ignorance. The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds.

Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation¹s own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.

No man can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 years of man’s recorded history in a time span of but a half-century. Stated in these terms, we know very little about the first 40 years, except at the end of them advanced man had learned to use the skins of animals to cover them. Then about 10 years ago, under this standard, man emerged from his caves to construct other kinds of shelter. Only five years ago man learned to write and use a cart with wheels. Christianity began less than two years ago. The printing press came this year, and then less than two months ago, during this whole 50-year span of human history, the steam engine provided a new source of power.

Newton explored the meaning of gravity. Last month electric lights and telephones and automobiles and airplanes became available. Only last week did we develop penicillin and television and nuclear power, and now if America’s new spacecraft succeeds in reaching Venus, we will have literally reached the stars before midnight tonight.

This is a breathtaking pace, and such a pace cannot help but create new ills as it dispels old, new ignorance, new problems, new dangers. Surely the opening vistas of space promise high costs and hardships, as well as high reward.

So it is not surprising that some would have us stay where we are a little longer to rest, to wait. But this city of Houston, this State of Texas, this country of the United States was not built by those who waited and rested and wished to look behind them. This country was conquered by those who moved forward–and so will space.

William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage.

If this capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not, and it is one of the great adventures of all time, and no nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in the race for space.

Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it–we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace. We have vowed that we shall not see space filled with weapons of mass destruction, but with instruments of knowledge and understanding.

Yet the vows of this Nation can only be fulfilled if we in this Nation are first, and, therefore, we intend to be first. In short, our leadership in science and in industry, our hopes for peace and security, our obligations to ourselves as well as others, all require us to make this effort, to solve these mysteries, to solve them for the good of all men, and to become the world’s leading space-faring nation.

We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say the we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.

There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation many never come again. But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

It is for these reasons that I regard the decision last year to shift our efforts in space from low to high gear as among the most important decisions that will be made during my incumbency in the office of the Presidency.

In the last 24 hours we have seen facilities now being created for the greatest and most complex exploration in man’s history. We have felt the ground shake and the air shattered by the testing of a Saturn C-1 booster rocket, many times as powerful as the Atlas which launched John Glenn, generating power equivalent to 10,000 automobiles with their accelerators on the floor. We have seen the site where the F-1 rocket engines, each one as powerful as all eight engines of the Saturn combined, will be clustered together to make the advanced Saturn missile, assembled in a new building to be built at Cape Canaveral as tall as a 48 story structure, as wide as a city block, and as long as two lengths of this field.

Within these last 19 months at least 45 satellites have circled the earth. Some 40 of them were “made in the United States of America” and they were far more sophisticated and supplied far more knowledge to the people of the world than those of the Soviet Union.

The Mariner spacecraft now on its way to Venus is the most intricate instrument in the history of space science. The accuracy of that shot is comparable to firing a missile from Cape Canaveral and dropping it in this stadium between the the 40-yard lines.

Transit satellites are helping our ships at sea to steer a safer course. Tiros satellites have given us unprecedented warnings of hurricanes and storms, and will do the same for forest fires and icebergs.

We have had our failures, but so have others, even if they do not admit them. And they may be less public.

To be sure, we are behind, and will be behind for some time in manned flight. But we do not intend to stay behind, and in this decade, we shall make up and move ahead.

The growth of our science and education will be enriched by new knowledge of our universe and environment, by new techniques of learning and mapping and observation, by new tools and computers for industry, medicine, the home as well as the school. Technical institutions, such as Rice, will reap the harvest of these gains.

And finally, the space effort itself, while still in its infancy, has already created a great number of new companies, and tens of thousands of new jobs. Space and related industries are generating new demands in investment and skilled personnel, and this city and this State, and this region, will share greatly in this growth. What was once the furthest outpost on the old frontier of the West will be the furthest outpost on the new frontier of science and space. Houston, your City of Houston, with its Manned Spacecraft Center, will become the heart of a large scientific and engineering community. During the next 5 years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration expects to double the number of scientists and engineers in this area, to increase its outlays for salaries and expenses to $60 million a year; to invest some $200 million in plant and laboratory facilities; and to direct or contract for new space efforts over $1 billion from this Center in this City.

To be sure, all this costs us all a good deal of money. This year’s space budget is three times what it was in January 1961, and it is greater than the space budget of the previous eight years combined. That budget now stands at $5,400 million a year–a staggering sum, though somewhat less than we pay for cigarettes and cigars every year. Space expenditures will soon rise some more, from 40 cents per person per week to more than 50 cents a week for every man, woman and child in the United Stated, for we have given this program a high national priority–even though I realize that this is in some measure an act of faith and vision, for we do not now know what benefits await us.

But if I were to say, my fellow citizens, that we shall send to the moon, 240,000 miles away from the control station in Houston, a giant rocket more than 300 feet tall, the length of this football field, made of new metal alloys, some of which have not yet been invented, capable of standing heat and stresses several times more than have ever been experienced, fitted together with a precision better than the finest watch, carrying all the equipment needed for propulsion, guidance, control, communications, food and survival, on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and then return it safely to earth, re-entering the atmosphere at speeds of over 25,000 miles per hour, causing heat about half that of the temperature of the sun–almost as hot as it is here today–and do all this, and do it right, and do it first before this decade is out–then we must be bold.

I’m the one who is doing all the work, so we just want you to stay cool for a minute. [laughter]

However, I think we’re going to do it, and I think that we must pay what needs to be paid. I don’t think we ought to waste any money, but I think we ought to do the job. And this will be done in the decade of the sixties. It may be done while some of you are still here at school at this college and university. It will be done during the term of office of some of the people who sit here on this platform. But it will be done. And it will be done before the end of this decade.

I am delighted that this university is playing a part in putting a man on the moon as part of a great national effort of the United States of America.

Many years ago the great British explorer George Mallory, who was to die on Mount Everest, was asked why did he want to climb it. He said, “Because it is there.”

Well, space is there, and we’re going to climb it, and the moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God’s blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked.

69 Responses to “Neil Armstrong, R.I.P.”


  1. Hill says:

    The era that Neil Armstrong was a part of was full of heroes and giants – men who pushed the limits of what science, technology, and their bodies could do to do what no one had ever done before. Some gave their lives. Of that era, Armstrong was among the best of the best.

    Armstrong, Sheppard, Grissom, Glen, Yeager, Cooper, Slayton, Aldrin, and the the rest of the guys who had the “Right Stuff” deserve a national monument.

    Reply »


  2. Great things says:

    So which private company is currently driving around Mars? Or do you believe that was faked?

    Reply »


  3. DKB says:

    Why, indeed, does Rice play Texas? Thanks for posting this. If not a better era as a whole it was certainly better in certain ways, The political landscape among them. I don’t know about y’all but I’m certainly going to give Mr. Armstrong the thought and wink that his family requested.

    Reply »

    FLPD Reply:

    I did that last night. Winked three times. Probably will go back out again tonight.

    Reply »


  4. Tom Barry says:

    Thank you, Paul. This is a relief from the caustic, poisonous and divisive political “discourse” that holds sway today.

    Reply »


  5. JohnBernardBooks says:

    What happened to the democrats….oh yeah LBJ, the Clintons and Obama.

    Reply »

    BCinBCS Reply:

    …and then JBB had to go ruin the tone of this post – what an American.

    Reply »

    anon Reply:

    They put men in space, JBB. They balanaced the budget (Clinton), they got Bin Laden (Obama), they gave us civil rights (Johnson). Almost all progress this country has seen came from Democrats. Republicans sit on there ass and complain.

    Reply »


  6. Robert Morrow says:

    NASA – the biggest waste of money in the history of mankind – ever.

    All it is is military pork barrel.

    Billions and billions to get a man hopping around on the moon – who cares? I could do without.

    Reply »

    Nostradamus Reply:

    Our global military hegemon, the collapse of the USSR, and China in check is due to space dominance thru NASA.

    Reply »

    Absolutely Sweet Marie Reply:

    So are cell phones, email, and the internet. Hell, this blog can thank NASA for its existence.

    Reply »

    Red Reply:

    Velcro & Tang. Oh, and many cancer-fighting medicines. Oh, and new plastics & preservatives & satellite communications. Really, most of modern life is due to developments by NASA.

    Reply »


  7. Old Charlie says:

    My wife and I cast our first votes for President Kennedy. It was an exciting time for us-maybe more so than others because we grew up in a very rural area and were the first in our families to obtain a college education-albeit with government help. We have since voted for candidates from both parties but the wing of the electorate that holds the views of Mr. Morrow is an example of all that is wrong with politics today. There were disagreements among the parties but I think everyone agreed with the goals stated by the President. Everyone understood that education was the key to progress and would require everyone to work together to keep America the greatest nation in history. We also knew it would take money but we were willing to pay the price. Life is good but it requires everyone to work together for the good of everyone-not just themselves. You can do well while doing good. But there is no freedom without government. The degree of government regulation needed is dependent on the number of people in a designated amount of space.
    The greater the number of people located in a given amount of space, the more and different kinds of regulation required. It doesn’t require the same type of govt. regulation in West Texas as it does in Houston. But there are certain types of regulation that all areas have in common. The trick is how to apply the necessary amount in all places. So I wish you would try to be something other than a flamethrower Mr. Morrow. Use all that energy and intelligence to propose solutions to problems that require the necessary amount of regulation that impinges on freedom the least. And govt. investment in research, infrastructure,education etc. is damn sure necessary.

    Reply »

    BCinBCS Reply:

    RE: Old Charlie
    What an astute observation and statement. It lightens my heart to be reminded that there are knowledgeable persons such as you.

    Reply »

    anita Reply:

    Old Charlie for Governor! Amen.

    Reply »

    #halftrue Reply:

    LIKE.

    Reply »


  8. Robert Morrow says:

    I have got a great idea. How about we quit throwing prostitutes in state prison? Some of those legislators and the one who signed that bill in 2001 have made heavy use of prostitutes over the years.

    350 whores in state prison. That is almost as much a waste of money as the NASA program. $18,000 a year cost to imprison a nonviolent hooker. Surely it has to be more than that.

    http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/texas-may-reconsider-sending-prostitutes-to-prison-2442950.html

    State Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, says “it’s nuts” that Texas has so many prostitutes in prison. All the state is doing is “warehousing” people who would be better served getting treatment “so they can get out and stay out of this business,” he says.

    350 hookers (mostly from Dallas, Houston, San Antonio) x 18,000 = $6,300,000 down the tubes.

    Reply »

    anita Reply:

    Keep thinking big, Morrow.

    Reply »


  9. Anonymous says:

    President Kennedy’s speech is indicative of how unlikely it is that he could be nominated by the Democrat Party of today. Kennedy was a true believer in “American Exceptionalism” — the exact opposite of our current “leader”.

    Reply »

    FLPD Reply:

    I disagree with you about President Obama (and actually, I also believe Kennedy could be the Democratic Party nominee today). I found this from June 30, 2012, on religion.blogs.cnn
    “I believe in American exceptionalism,” President Obama said in France in 2009, “just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.”
    But the president has since sounded a different tune. In his Air Force Academy commencement speech in May, Obama repeatedly expressed support for American exceptionalism. “The United States has been, and will always be, the one indispensable nation in world affairs,” Obama said. “It’s one of the many examples of why America is exceptional.”

    In fact, Obama appears to be the first sitting president to publicly use those words, political experts say. Given their place in the modern American political lexicon, nearly 400 years after Winthrop first gave voice to the idea, he is unlikely to be the last.

    Reply »

    Whoa, Nellie! Reply:

    Sloganeering certainly beats wise policy. I’m sold! USA! USA! Number 1 Forever!

    I’ll keep chanting until they wheel me away to the poorhouse with the rest of the unemployed, uninsured, and unwanted pawns.

    Reply »


  10. JohnBernardBooks says:

    what happened to the democrats…did I leave out Carter? LBJ, Carter, Clinton Obama nuff said.
    get ready for 16 years of RR.

    Reply »

    anon Reply:

    Right there in Washington with Dewhurst.

    Reply »


  11. Patriotone says:

    We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

    This spirit cannot be kindled in a country that has been manipulated into hating their government. I can’t do much, we can do anything. Rural electrification, screw worm eradication, space flight, Social Security, Medicare. These programs worked and work. It is unpatriotic to hate your government.

    Reply »


  12. Anonymous says:

    Nice post Paul!

    Reply »


  13. No Le Hace says:

    Thanks Paul…this reminds me of when our country chose to do the unimaginable. Yes what a waste of money that allowed us to use our wireless networks on our cell,phones to critize a time when all Americans took great pride in a mission accomplished.

    Reply »


  14. Sibley says:

    Very nice. I enjoyed that.
    Thanks Paul

    Reply »


  15. Jeff Crosby says:

    Our greatest presidents — from both parties — extolled courage. Their pretenders stoked fear.

    Reply »


  16. Robert Morrow says:

    Is “American exceptionalism” fascist code phrasing for “we rule the world through military might?”

    I am beginning to think it is. My question with NASA is – can’t all this science, even military, research be done in the private sector and not on the backs of millions of taxpayers?

    Couldn’t the private, free market capitalism economy have produced Tang Instant breakfast without a government expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars?

    Ron Paul hates the government; yet I would consider him a pretty patriotic man. And having said that, what is this obsession with patriotism especially since it is most often expressed by traitors who do things like kill JFK, wage endless wars in the name of the United Nations, make dirty deals with mullahs to NOT release American hostages in 1980 (before the election), CIA drug smuggling.

    Ron Paul just gave his “We are the Future Speech” in Tampa Bay – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-tDfg-rAzs . My Pauler friends tell me it was Ron Paul Raw; a defense of the individual, an attack on the state & the Federal Reserve and the endless wars.

    And that he was not one bit conciliatory with the GOP. As for me, I have a scorched earth policy with regard to (95%) of the Republican party. I am rooting for Obama to win, as the lessor of 2 evils option.

    Reply »

    Red Reply:

    SpaceX, the most commercial spaceflight company, never would have existed without NASA. So, the short answer is “no, we never would have landed on the moon without government paying for it”. At their heart, the lunar missions were science expeditions (which is why there are hundreds of thousands of pounds of moon rocks now on earth). No university could pay for it or manage the logistical problems to do it themselves.

    Reply »

    JohnBernardBooks Reply:

    exactly, so why is President Obama cutting NASA’s budget while increasing entitlements?

    Reply »


  17. Spiro Eagleton says:

    NASA was doomed when it became less of a military operation full of astronauts who served in the military to an operation full of lame, meaningless missions with the “first woman in space”, the “first teacher in space”, the “first African-American in space”, “the first Hispanic in space”, “the first homosexual in space”, the “first left-handed Hawaiian in space”, etc., etc. It lost it’s mojo at that point and could never get it back. The administrator, Charles Boldin, goes around telling folks how NASA’s prime mission is to reach out to Arab nations. Huh? Now NASA even has a lame name for it’s Mars rover. The Curiosity? Next we’ll have the Inquisitive. Shut NASA down before it wastes any more money.

    Reply »


  18. paulburka says:

    I’ll grant you that NASA lost its way after the Apollo program. Nobody would have the faintest idea how to build a Saturn rocket today. I don’t think the space station accomplished much. But sending a rover to Mars is the sort of thing NASA should be doing. Manned space flight, with all of the redundancies required for safety, is way too costly unless and until somebody can figure a way to land a human being on Mars with a high probability of safety.

    Reply »

    Vernon Reply:

    But it’s precisely that need to guarantee the high probability of safety to human life that costs so much. Given the dangers of prolonged space travel, that cost will never change.

    As person with only a rudimentary knowledge of Mars, I don’t see any advantages of sending a man given today’s technology. We can find out what’s there without needing a person on the ground.

    Other than simply providing a historic marker or inspiration to the people (both very admirable and valuable), there are better ways to use the might of the federal government in achieving an equivalent to a modern-day moon landing.

    Efficient renewable energy would be my first thought. Coincidentally, I think there may already be some break though work being done at UT of Austin on that very subject.

    Reply »


  19. JohnBernardBooks says:

    exactly, all good ideas, NASA, EPA, Homeland Security are soon hijacked by the crazies who then strive for PC goals.

    Reply »


  20. No Le Hace says:

    Hey Morrow, thanks for showing your brilliance again. TANG was developed by General Foods….it didnt get much play until NASA used it and no NASA funds were used in its development.

    Reply »


  21. hooah! says:

    The difference between the America of JFK and that of Barack Obama is detailed in the poisonous comments up above. In 50+ years we have regressed from the debates about the direction of The Republic to the slime of the campaigns of the early 19th Century.

    What’s next….another civil war?

    Reply »

    anony Reply:

    Naw. The Nugents of the World (GOP) can’t actually DO anything but whine and bitch. They cant lead or govern. Civil war? That is going on in one place, the GOP.

    Reply »


  22. No Le Hace says:

    Hooah…it starts in Lubbock, having gone to Tech I suggest we go ahead and give that part of the state to the UN

    Reply »


  23. Dollars and Sense says:

    Can we all agree, at least all but one, that our comrade Robert Morrow be launched into orbit to further study the “true” cost of NASA?

    Reply »

    Robert Morrow Reply:

    I dunno. After the first public school teacher to blow up in space, Christa McAuliffe, died I have been reluctant to take government run transportation.

    I remember watching live the Challenger explosion on 1/28/86 from my parent’s basement. That was when I was “in shape” and doing things like supersetting jumping rope, push ups, sit-ups, a regular homemade P90x workout that would kill me now.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster

    Reply »

    Anonymous Reply:

    I’d have kept you in a basement too

    Reply »

    Zelda McMurtry Reply:

    HA! Morrow lived in his parent’s basement. Now he just lives in a big, expensive house in west Austin that they paid for. Some things never change!


  24. Pat says:

    Burka, you have to cover this. Apparently our major cities are considering “seceding” from Texas on the Medicaid expansion. The article doesn’t cite the real reason for this–the elimination of DiSH funding will leave public hospitals billions in the red without the Medicaid expansion to make up for it–but the significance is monumental.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/texas-counties-consider-going-it-alone-on-medicaid-expansion/2012/08/26/f35686dc-e322-11e1-98e7-89d659f9c106_story.html

    Reply »


  25. anony says:

    Imagine Paul, what our state could have become…and how the move to conservatism and political cronyism derailed our great state. And why does Rice play Texas?

    Reply »

    JohnBernardBooks Reply:

    “Imagine Paul, what our state could have become…and how the move to conservatism and political cronyism derailed our great state.”
    yeah we could have been another Kalifornia!?!

    Reply »

    paulburka Reply:

    In the four years I was at Rice, Texas beat Rice twice, Rice beat Texas once, and Rice tied Texas 14-14 when Texas was ranked number one. (The two losses weren’t close.)

    Reply »

    Robert Morrow Reply:

    That is a pretty good record from Rice’s point of view.

    Reply »


  26. Willie James says:

    JBB, you really are dumber than a bucket of cow piss.

    Reply »

    JohnBernardBooks Reply:

    Actually willie itd the democrats who are “dunber than a bucket of cow piss” as Texas voters have not elected a democrat to statewide office in 20 years.
    I know why, but do you?

    Reply »


  27. sweet smell of the PCL says:

    so thats what that is

    Reply »


  28. I'm Pavlov. Ring a Bell? says:

    Boom

    http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2012/08/dewhurst-receives-warm-welcome-from-cruz-leaning-delegation.html/

    Reply »


  29. Eric Bearse says:

    Those of us who write speeches for a living could spend a year going through old Kennedy speeches. It is a treasure trove of big ideas and soaring rhetoric.

    Reply »


  30. sungsam says:

    Morrow–while we are on the subject of NASA, I’ve been meaning to ask you and your absurdly conspiratorial mind–Do you believe we actually landed on the moon–or was that a hoax too?

    Reply »

    Robert Morrow Reply:

    That is just such a stupid comment, “sungsam.” So you conflate belief in a moon landing hoax which I have never commented on with everything else I talk about?

    Maybe you are just goddamn ignorant of a lot of things – have you ever considered that? What do you do – just sit and watch CNN or FOX or believe everything insanely corrupt government leaders of both political parties tell you? Is that the extent of your *critical thinking* and search for the truth.

    I talk a lot about how Lyndon Johnson, Texas oil executives and military intelligence murdered JFK? Is that really a stretch for you, partner?

    I also talk about about Bush/Clinton/Oliver North/CIA drug smuggling in the 1980′s. Again – information on that has not sunk into your lead encased head?

    I also talk about that treasonous deal that the Reagan campaign made with the Iranians in 1980 to not release the American hostages until after the election. I interviewed Bobbie Ray Inman, “Mr. Intelligence” who was #2 at the CIA under Reagan and he told me there was “no doubt” (Inman’s words) that such a deal occurred and that William Casey engineered it. The history books need to start putting that one in as a *fact* not a theory.

    I also talk about the Franklin pedophile ring of the 1980′s. A pedophile ring that catered to high level homosexual pedophiles mostly in the Republican party and media and business. Read the book the Franklin Scandal by Nick Bryant, where he nails that story down.

    I do believe that TWA Flight 800 was shot down by a US Navy missile and 1996 and Clinton and the Navy were so embarrassed about that dreadful fiasco that they covered it up. It was also an election year and Dole was desperate for something to make hay of. Is that such a tough cookie for you to swallow?

    Reply »

    Anonymous Reply:

    Go find a blog where everyone is looking backwards. That is where you need to be. You see, no one cares about your conspiracy theories or cover ups. If we did, we’d buy the books. I haven’t seen any of them on any best seller lists. Get lost.

    Reply »

    Robert Morrow Reply:

    Looking backward is important. Understand the past and you might understand the present and decide where you want to go in the future.

    Not only that, these same political figures appear again and again and again. The Bush family is a perfect example of that. The Bushes are like a nasty case of gonnorhea or genital warts that just won’t go away.

    If people understood the “past” of the Bush family, they would immediately be disqualified from national or state politics. GHW Bush & Jeb Bush have a very dirty past; so much so that it disqualifies Jeb Bush from holding ANY office, much less the presidency which he (and George P.) are shooting for.


  31. Woohoo! says:

    More redistricting fun!

    Reply »


  32. Anonymous says:

    No post on redistricting or the Dew??? I want to get JBB’s thoughts on the matter.

    Reply »

    JohnBernardBooks Reply:

    why do you have none of your own…again?
    wait I’m confused which anon is this?

    Reply »


  33. JohnBernardBooks says:

    all you need to know on redistricting.
    Gen Abbott will appeal redistricting to SCOTUS.
    Gen Abbott will this along with the VRA sec 5. VRA sec 5 will be history along with dems.

    After losing in November dems will will need to decide, do they become part of America again or die a slow death.

    Reply »

    Robert Morrow Reply:

    Obama is a clear favorite over Romney. Check http://www.intrade.com .

    Reply »


  34. Woohoo! says:

    #RNCpowergrab

    Reply »

    JohnBernardBooks Reply:

    absolutely. When the first censured Atty Gen Holder was ignoring the laws of our great nation, surely dems had to realize there were consequences.

    Reply »

    Woohoo! Reply:

    Yes, that’s it exactly.

    Reply »


  35. JohnBernardBooks says:

    How uplifting to watch the grownups in Tampa with their positive messages after 3.5 years of failed policies.
    There’s light at the end of the tunnel.

    Reply »

    leon on the leon Reply:

    Dang JBB! Bloomberg reporting job growth recently higher in Kalifornia than Texas. How can this be?
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-29/california-defies-lower-tax-texas-in-creating-more-jobs.html

    Reply »


  36. bnrtn says:

    I thank government for nothing. I thank Mr. Armstrong as representative for the thousands of people responsible for the accomplishment.

    Reply »


  37. SZ in SA says:

    Romney hurt himself badly today and for no particularly good reason. He tried to jump hard on a foreign policy crisis and blame Obama – but he did it before he had all the facts. Then when he had the facts, he was too stupid to walk it back. Its that simple. The fanatical right won’t care – they only care that he’s not Obama. Everyone else (i.e. rational thinkers) will see this for the politically crass and foolish move that it was. Burka should change the headline to read “When” rather than “If.”

    Reply »

Leave a Reply

E-mail

Password

Remember me

Forgot your password?

X (close)

Registering gets you access to online content, allows you to comment on stories, add your own reviews of restaurants and events, and join in the discussions in our community areas such as the Recipe Swap and other forums.

In addition, current TEXAS MONTHLY magazine subscribers will get access to the feature stories from the two most recent issues. If you are a current subscriber, please enter your name and address exactly as it appears on your mailing label (except zip, 5 digits only). Not a subscriber? Subscribe online now.

E-mail

Re-enter your E-mail address

Choose a password

Re-enter your password

Name

 
 

Address

Address 2

City

State

Zip (5 digits only)

Country

What year were you born?

Are you...

Male Female

Remember me

X (close)