10 Hilariously Incorrect Predictions About Texas A&M

Anybody (including many Aggies) who said they expected Texas A&M's first season in the Southeastern Conference to go so well is lying. But it's still funny to look back at all the naysayers. 
Wed January 9, 2013 2:00 am
Associated Press | David J. Phillip

Now we know: Texas A&M is the fifth-best team in the country. And the third-best team in the SEC

Or rather, that’s what both  the polls say. Personally, I’d put them at least third nationally (fourth if you include Ohio State). Finishing 11-2 with a win over Alabama is obviously more impressive than Notre Dame’s 12-1 finish given last night’s BCS game, and so was beating Oklahoma compared to Georgia’s bowl win. The case for #2 is also pretty strong. ( Andy Staples of Sports Illustrated, to name just one voter, chose A&M over Oregon for that spot.)

But either way, it’s a far cry from the pre-season, when the Aggies were 30th in the coach’s poll, and unranked by the AP.

Which only makes you ask: what did the coaches know?! Because anybody (including many Aggies) who says they expected Texas A&M’s first season in the Southeastern Conference to go so well, or even end with eight-nine wins, is probably lying.

This tweet from Sports Illustrated’s Pete Thamel before the school announced its exit from the Big 12 was, at the time, totally fair.

Entire college landscape could shift thanks to a program that hasn’t won a league title since 1998 and has one bowl win since 1995. #Gigem

— Pete Thamel(@ SIPeteThamel) August 12, 2011

Instead, we saw A&M’s first 11-win season since 1998, its first undefeated road season since 1939, and its second straight bowl victory since Thamel wrote that tweet.

Oh yeah, and quarterback Johnny Manziel won the Heisman Trophy, and the Aggies were the only team to beat up on eventual national champion Alabama … in Alabama. That’s why you can say they should be #2–or look at those final rankings and realize that the four-team college football playoff slated to begin in 2014 still won’t be enough.

In any case, while most sportwriters have already made their mea culpas, hindsight’s still hilarious! Here’s some of the things people originally said about the Aggies in the SEC, both at the time the realignment happened, and prior to the 2012 season.


Steven Lassan, Athlon Sports

Athlon slotted the Aggies at 5th place in the SEC West, behind LSU, Alabama, Arkansas and Auburn.

Texas A&M has the resources necessary to eventually compete in the SEC West. Could this move help the Aggies on the recruiting trail versus Texas? Only time will tell, but for 2012, Texas A&M has a lot of work to do in order to reach the postseason.


Cedric Golden, Austin American-Statesman

The Aggies run the risk of getting their heads bashed in for the next few falls. A&M; hasn’t exactly blazed a football trail in the Big 12—with 12 straight seasons of fewer than 10 wins and a five-game bowl losing streak. (And remember: Three of those five bowl losses have come to SEC teams, by an average score of 41-17.)… 

Why leave now? Mike Sherman’s just starting to get a solid foothold in this conference.


Stewart Mandel, Sports Illustrated

It hardly seems worth diluting the best on-field product in college football today for a few extra millions, which is exactly what the SEC would be doing in welcoming A&M, a program that last won a national title in 1939 (five different SEC schools have won one just in the BCS era) and has rarely even contended for a Big 12 title (winning its sole crown 13 years ago). Since the

More Texas Monthly

Loading, please wait...