The Menil Divorces the Art Guys

The Menil removed "The Art Guys Marry a Plant," a controversial performance piece, from its collection, a move that is stirring up Houston's art scene once again. 
Mon January 14, 2013 10:55 pm
Everett Taasevigen

The life span of a live oak is normally about 200 years. For many in Houston’s arts community, that is turning out to be way too long for a tree, specifically one very problematic young live oak that was unceremoniously evicted from its plot on the grounds of the Menil last Friday, and, not coincidentally, from the museum’s collection as well. If this sounds a little peculiar, let me bring you up to date on what has been, from its beginning in 2009, a strange story that has only grown stranger over the last four years, and that now threatens to sully the reputation of one of the most unsullied museums in the world.

So: On a June day four years ago, Michael Galbreth and Jack Massing, a local duo of Dadaistic performance artists who go by the name The Art Guy s, staged a performance piece in which the two of them married a live oak sapling. “The Art Guys Marry a Plant” was, Galbreth and Massing felt, a work of art that celebrated man’s relationship to nature and, maybe, pointed out the obligation of mankind to protect that natural world. But not everyone saw it that way. To Douglas Britt, then the arts reporter for the Houston Chronicle, the piece looked like two guys in tuxedos making fun of gay marriage . Controversy ensued, in which Britt, who now goes by the name of Devon Britt-Darby, subsequently staged his own work of art, a 2011 wedding at which he was joined in matrimony to… a woman! (Britt-Darby is gay.)

Around the same time, the Art Guys decided to find a permanent home for their tree/spouse. Through a set of circumstances that cheered some and infuriated others, the Menil took the tree into its permanent collection in the fall of 2011. A formal tree planting ceremony—another piece of art—was held the day after Britt’s “wedding,” with sculptor James Surls and cultural critic Lawrence Weschler talking about the importance of the work. A nice plaque was installed, commemorating the event.

By then many in Houston’s LGBT community were beside themselves, most notably the powerful art dealer Hiram Butler, who had even more powerful friends on the Menil board. Infuriating the Art Guys—with whom he had been friends—he began lobbying to get the tree expelled from the collection. Civil war looked to be a likely prospect for Houston’s arts community. Finally, on December 3, 2011, someone or more than one person attacked the tree under cover of night, vandalizing the sapling so that it more closely resembled a sad little shrub.

Following that, the story, which I wrote about last March , seemed to die down. After confessing to a dark and sordid past as a meth addict and male prostitute, Britt-Darby abruptly left his job at the Chronicle and announced that he would be returning to his old job as a sex worker. (He talked about all this in a series of very strange YouTube videos in which he was usually topless and very buff.) Meanwhile, the tree remained under the care of the Menil’s illustrious gardening staff. Things seemed to have returned to normal. Or at least they seemed to. In fact, the tree had been vandalized at least two more times in 2012, which made things very uncomfortable for the museum, which after all could not provide 24/7 protection in the open air. Some time last week, the Menil told the Art Guys they were giving them their piece back. Almost immediately the arts website Glasstire, which is owned and operated by Michael Galbreth’s wife, Rainey Knudsen, broke the news in the form of an uncharacteristically muted letter from the Art Guys:

The Menil Collection has decided to remove “The Art Guys Marry A Plant” from their collection. Tentative plans are to remove the tree and plaque and return them to us soon, perhaps sometime next week, although the specifics have not yet been determined. We offer this news to you without further comment.  We have nothing further to say right now.

Now the next battle in this war threatens to break out. On Friday evening, an email popped into my inbox from Surls. I’d been CC-ed on a scathing letter from him to Menil board member Marilyn Oshman, blaming Butler for the de-accession. (Surls later confirmed that the letter was meant for public consumption.)

Marilyn,

I write this to you because you are only board member of the Menil I know personally. I have to say I am amazed at the sheer “Gutlessness” of the Museum World, the only way I can look at this is as follows: Hiram Butler has won, he has simply beat the Menil to a whimpering  pulp. Hiram Butler - 1, the Menil and all artists – 0. This is sad on so many levels that I can not even begin to state them all, but even if the piece of art was really bad, who the shit is Hiram Butler to say what will or will not be in the collection of any given museum.

I am truly ashamed of the Menil for letting a small-minded unintellectual, and yes even evil, art dealer "Lord over" one of what was one of the great museums. Ms. Menil would just die all over again if she knew of this Gutless Act by her beloved museum.  History will not be kind to this moment of coward-ness on the part of your director. Even if the board said yes to this, he should resign before letting an art dealer rule a museums actions. I am truly ashamed for a place that I always had the greatest respect for.

James

When I asked him about it later, Surls wrote back that, “This ain't Ms. DeMenil's museum, it now belongs to the weak.” In Glasstire, Knudsen (who, of course, is married to one of the artists) was equally harsh, claiming in a post entitled “On Institutional Cowardice” that the museum was using the vandalism as an excuse to dispose of the tree,

More Texas Monthly

Loading, please wait...

Most Read

  • Viewed
  • Past:
  • 1 week