Facebook > Email > More Pinterest Print Twitter Play

In Their Own Words

The Gun-Control Activist

Leslie Ervin

Photograph by Trevor Paulhus

Ialways had this feeling that Lex wasn’t okay. He was born in 1992, but it wasn’t until he hit fourth grade that we learned something was really not okay. That’s when Lex was diagnosed with Asperger’s.

Doctors said there was no medication that Lex could take. We brought him to therapy because they recommended role-playing-type things. But he hated it. He often just sat passively looking out the window for the entire hour. We tried everything. Nothing helped.

We’ve lived in Austin with the kids since 1999. When Lex was younger, he would play with his three siblings. They’re all one year apart, and Lex is the oldest. But as he grew up, he became verbally abusive, and the more they kind of became afraid of him. When Lex started becoming more critical in his illness—I would say it was in eighth grade. And we didn’t realize it, but I believe he started showing signs of schizophrenia. Then he started getting more and more detached the older he got, which is a pattern. Kids hit their late teens, and that’s when schizophrenia kicks in. He was spending more time alone, more time in his room.

That was all up until his eighteenth birthday. That was the day I got a call from Joe McBride up at McBride’s gun store. As soon as they opened, Lex walked in there and tried to buy a gun. Joe said, “Your son’s here. He looks like he’s on PCP, and I’m not selling him a gun.”

All of a sudden, I felt that we had entered a very, very dangerous zone. I called the police, and the crisis-intervention team came over, and they sat down with [my husband] Scott and me. They said, based on their talk with Lex, “We agree with you that this young man is unstable, in crisis. We don’t exactly know what’s going on, but we do not believe that he should have firearms.”

But they said there’s nothing they could do to prevent Lex from buying a firearm. There had to be an incident. Like he had to be arrested for some reason. He needed to be found a danger to himself or others before the law would get involved.

He went to Academy and Cabela’s and started buying guns. He bought pistols, he had a long gun.

Scott was an attorney, and he said, “There’s nothing we can do right now.” We couldn’t commit him long-term, because at that point he was an adult and he refused to get treatment. The police agreed he was unstable, and they basically said, “We’re so sorry, ma’am. There’s nothing we can do to help you.”

That’s when we really started getting scared, because he had guns now. But Scott always said, “We just have to love him unconditionally. We can’t change him. He’s not going to hurt anybody. He’s our son.” This is the worst part. You don’t know somebody’s going to do something till they do it.

But I’ll tell you, toward the end, this is what happened. One night in 2013, Lex said to Scott, “Come outside. I want you to look at the Skilsaw. It’s not working.” So Scott gets up and walks around to the side of our house, where it’s dark, and Scott said that as he was walking out there, the hair on the back of his neck started to stand up. Scott begins bending down to get the saw, and he turns around and looks at Lex, and Lex has a pipe wrench raised. Scott says, “Lex! What are you doing?” And Lex, of course, says, “Ha! Did I scare ya?” Which is what he would always say.

The next night, Lex again came in and said, “Come out and help me fix the Skilsaw.” And Scott said, “No, I’m not going out there at night.” Scott, at that point, was scared. He said to me, “I think Lex is trying to kill me.”

I asked him, “What’s going to happen?”

Scott said, “Well, if there’s an altercation, I hope I prevail. But if I don’t, if Lex kills me, I know you guys will be safe and Lex will get the help he needs, finally.”

It was just any other day. I came home from work at five o’clock. I had a dinner planned with friends, and I was saying, “I’m tired. I don’t know if I’m going to go out.” Lex said, “You should. You never go out.”

So I said goodbye to Scott. Lex had been kind of pacing around, which is not unusual for him. He paced. But he was waiting for me to leave, of course. I pulled out of the driveway, and he must have gone right in and done it.

I got to the restaurant, walked in, sat down, and [my youngest son] Max called. I answered it and Max is screaming, “Lex stabbed Scott! Come home!”

The way that it happened—well, the police said Lex walked in and hit Scott on the back of the head with a pipe wrench. Scott spun around in his chair, and Lex stabbed him twice. And those two puncture wounds were fatal. The ER doc would say that once he was hit with that knife, even if there was an operating table in that room, we couldn’t have saved him.

But it takes a long time for someone to bleed out. Scott called for Max and was yelling at Lex, “No! No!” Max ran in and grabbed Lex. And Lex was saying, “Stand back. I’m a trained assassin. I work for the CIA. This man is an impostor. He’s going to kill the family, and I’m here to protect you.”

Max was able to pull Lex away. Finally, they broke a vase over Lex’s head. At that point, Max walked Scott out into the kitchen, laid him down on the floor, and stayed with him until EMS came.

That was all by—I left at 6:20—it was by 7:15 that all this happened. On that beautiful summer evening.

Lex was found not guilty by reason of insanity. By the grace of God, he is now getting help at the North Texas State Hospital, in Vernon. They’re kind to him there.

After the period where I was putting my life back together, the first thing I wanted to do was get involved with NAMI [the National Alliance on Mental Illness]. At the same time, I started working with Texas Gun Sense [a group advocating “commonsense” gun control], because I realized what was necessary was a gun-violence protective order, which could have temporarily taken away Lex’s guns, because he was clearly unstable.

It’s not complicated. People who are in crisis should not be allowed to purchase or own firearms. “Crisis” being the key word. “Crisis” means not in your right mind.

Had we had a gun-violence protective order as a law in Texas, when I called the police and said that my mentally ill son in crisis had guns, they would have interviewed him. If they agreed he shouldn’t have guns, they would have confiscated his guns pending an evaluation by a professional.

And if he’d been diagnosed schizophrenic, and if he’d gone on medication, then he might have been able to get his guns back. But unfortunately, we don’t have that law in Texas.

Lex did not shoot Scott. Let’s be clear. He stabbed Scott. But if he hadn’t been subdued and arrested, if he’d been alone and killed Scott, who knows what he would have done next? He had an arsenal of guns. He’s not going to stay home and watch TV. It’s quite likely he would have taken his guns and hurt innocent people. But thank God he didn’t, and we’ll never know.

One out of five people experiences a mental illness. They take medication. They’re productive members of society. They can go purchase firearms, and it’s fine. But it’s someone like Lex, who’s clearly in crisis, who should not be allowed.

When I sit down and tell my story, I ask, “Do you think that a young man who would murder his dad a month later with a knife should be allowed to own firearms?” I don’t think there’s one person who would say yes. This would be an unmedicated paranoid schizophrenic having delusions going and purchasing firearms. I haven’t met one person at the Texas Capitol who has said yes.

And I hope that this is something that can become a law in Texas. It can save lives. So I’m going to keep going down there, keep telling my story over and over. I can’t not do it. This is a way to take something terrible and use it for a greater good and to help others. It’s what Scott would have wanted. —As told to Dave Mann

Related Content

  • Anonymous

    What strong measures will be introduced with this proposal so that the stable law-abiding gun owners will not be targets for abuses of this proposed remedy?

    • John Stephens

      None whatsoever.

  • Mark Farris

    Exactly this is a perfect mental health issue not a gun control issue. Again Obama doesn’t want to do anything to
    change the laws to prevent offenders, mental cases and straw purchases to be prohibited or jailed for their activity because it does not affect EVERYONE which is why it’s called gun control.

    • WestTexan70

      Good grief.

  • Paul Hurst

    The victim was hit with a pipe wrench, and then fatally stabbed.

    How does this have anything to do with guns?

  • FiftycalTX

    So, since the crazy guy STABBED his father to death, GUN CONTROL would be the answer! Anti-gun liberals are mentally ill.

  • EmmyP

    Yup! A pipe assault and a knife murder clearly indicate the need for more gun control.

    • so you think it’s just fine that this UNSTABLE young man was able to BUY GUNS? Hello???Did you actually READ the article?

      • John Kyle

        What law, not already in place, would stop him from being able to obtain a firearm?

      • And he was adjudicated mentally defective with the verdict. What more do you want?

      • More over this article proves (just in case it wasn’t obvious for you) other devices can be used for murder. He used a knife and a pipe to murder and you and the immediately jump to gun control proving you are more interested in limiting gun ownership than you ate about preventing murder.

  • JD

    “My son killed his father with a knife and wrench, therefore, no one should have guns.”

    • Jessica Jin

      Absolutely nothing about this piece suggests this. In fact, it states the opposite: “One out of five people experiences a mental illness. They take medication. They’re productive members of society. They can go purchase firearms, and it’s fine. But it’s someone like Lex, who’s clearly in crisis, who should not be allowed.” Please flush your hyperbole down the toilet.

      • JD

        Except what isn’t in the article is the fact that this woman testified against Campus Carry in Texas in front of the legislature, willfully omitting the fact that her husband was killed with a knife and wrench in order to project the story that the fact that her son purchased guns was the reason her husband was dead. She was using her son’s narrative to prevent law-abiding age 21+ adults from having the tools to protect themselves in the event of an assault, rape, or shooting at college campuses in Texas. She had an avenue to prevent her son from purchasing firearms. She needed to get him adjudicated as mentally defective or involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility. Then, he would have been Federally prohibited from purchasing or possessing a firearm for life. But her husband would still be dead because he wasn’t killed with a gun. So believe what you want, but this woman continues to warp her story to create emotion to drive legislation that has nothing to do with her son and would not have saved her husband’s life.

    • I suggest you take a REMIEDAL READING COURSE: the article says that MENTALLY UNSTABLE PEOPLE should NOT ahve guns–NOT “everyone”. Unless YOU are mentally unstable you can keep your arsenal.

      • John Kyle

        What law, not already in place, will stop a mentally unstable person from obtaining a firearm? Useless laws make useful laws useless.

      • JD

        Please read my comment in response to Jessica Jin in which I describe some things that are not in this article regarding what this woman has done with this testimony as it relates to adults having the tools to defend themselves at college campuses. She has used this story before to push her anti-gun agenda, even though her son did not use the guns to kill her husband. She had a way to keep her son from purchasing firearms, but she did not use it. She would rather blame others for her failure than bear the responsibility herself. Either way, her husband would still be dead because the guns were not a factor in his death.

  • Frank_in_Spokane

    “I started working with Texas Gun Sense [a group advocating “commonsense” gun control] … ”

    From Texas Gun Sense’s website:

    Texas does not:

    – Regulate the transfer or possession of assault weapons [sic], 50 caliber rifles, or large capacity [sic] ammunition magazines; or
    – Require registration of firearms, or reporting of lost or stolen firearms.

    Regulating military-pattern semi-automatics, .50 caliber rifles and standard-capacity magazines is not “commonsense gun control.” Neither is requiring gun registration.

  • Mel Meskill

    “There was nothing they could do.” She blames the police and others for her short-comings. Why didn’t she and her husband have him in counseling, even if he didn’t like it.

    • Her son was 18–an ADULT. She could NOT make him do anything! Please improve your reading & comprehension skills.

  • Coldsteel1983

    So let’s start with someone declaring a person who exhibits these conditions/behavior as a “mental defective” which I believe are the exact words that the FEDERAL 4473 uses. If you answer dishonestly, your guilty of lying on the form and subject to those penalties in addition to whatever should be done (involuntary committment?) to an adjudged mental defective who tries to or does purchase firearms.

    There are already laws… As some have said, this is a sad, depressing example of how our mental health care system has broken down.

  • sundog50

    Poor woman…blaming an inert object for her poor parenting and lack of action. Might as well call for banning knives & pipe wrenches too!

  • Grindstone50k

    Victim was hit with a pipe wrench and stabbed to death with a knife. Mother calls for more gun control. I see which side of the family the kid got the mental illness from.

  • Texx Mexx

    Is this the best the gungrabbers can come up with? We need “gun violence restraining orders” because someone stabbed someone with a knife and beat him with a pipe wrench? Because who knows what he would have done if he hadn’t been arrested? Given that he was mentally ill, the obvious answer would seem to be, no one knows. But clearly, if he was set on killing someone else, he wouldn’t need a gun to do it with. Is Texas Monthly playing a joke on the gun-control crowd, or are they collectively so addle-brained that they think they are making a good argument here?

  • JustASec

    I see where the kid got his “crazies”.

    • YOu’re cruel AND an a-hole

      • JustASec

        I am sure you are quite charming yourself. /sarc

  • Airskeeter

    Not a gun control activist. A woman trying to assuage her guilt. He killed his father with a wrench and a knife. She needs to be banning wrenches and knives. She conveniently leaves out the part where he tried to assault her, prior to the murder of her estranged husband. (But living together in the best Interest of Lex) her activism is pure guilt over what she did not do prior to her husband’s murder.

  • You do realize “adjudicated mentally defective” includes a “not guilty for reasons of insanity”.