Facebook > Email > More Pinterest Print Twitter Play

Dawnna Dukes and the Dangers of Political Perks

When do the benefits of office become the excess of privilege?

By Comments

Photograph by Bob Daemmrich

Perhaps over time, over years of public service, it just becomes impossible for some politicians to see the line that divides the normal perks of office from becoming abuses of privilege. That kind of myopia has landed many Texas elected officials in legal trouble over the years, and the latest is state representative Dawnna Dukes of Austin.

On Wednesday, she was indicted on two misdemeanor charges of abuse of official capacity and thirteen felony counts of felony corruption—allegations that could put her in prison for up to 28 years. The charges stem from her alleged use of a state employee as a nanny. She has denied guilt and claimed the entire affair is nothing more than complaints from disgruntled former employees. Dukes took to her Facebook page for a brief defense after the indictments were returned by a Travis County grand jury:

I am disappointed but I expected that if I was sworn into office in January 10th that this indictment would follow. All I can say today is that I will be entering a plea of Not Guilty. On the advice of my attorneys, I have not spoken on any of the allegations since February 2016. As well, since this is now a case in court, on the advice of my attorneys, I will continue to have no further comment. My attorneys and I will respond in court at the appropriate time. Thank you to my constituents, loving family and dear friends for your warm regards, prayers and constant support.

As a young African-American woman, Dukes entered the legislature in 1995 with the promise of potential. Somehow, though, she never achieved the acclaim of her predecessor, Wilhelmina Delco, who retired from the after two decades of service with an almost saint-like reputation. The East Austin Democrat often has been praised for her courage to stand up on liberal issues important to minorities and women. In 2003, she fled with other Democratic House members to Oklahoma in an unsuccessful attempt to halt a Republican redistricting plan. However, she also received the scorn of many Democrats for supporting Republican Tom Craddick of Midland as the House speaker, a vote cast apparently to obtain a seat on the powerful budget-writing appropriations committee.

There always was something opportunistic about Dukes, as can be found in a collection of older stories housed in the newspaper archives databank Newsbank. Even before taking office, there was a scandal involving the Austin City Council. Several members with ties to Dukes and her father had voted to give companies owned by the family lucrative contracts connected to the city-run airport. In the late nineties, the FBI interviewed Dukes while looking into Houston airport contract irregularities involving a Houston councilman. Dukes defused her role in the controversy by claiming undercover FBI agents were trying to find out if she was corruptible but failed. During an ugly 2004 fight in Travis County over toll roads, opponents accused Dukes of casting a vote on a local mobility authority that would benefit her sister, Stacy Rhone, a civil engineer. In 2008, the Austin American-Statesman editorialized that Dukes’ district deserved better leadership. She had used her influence at City Hall on behalf of a film production developer who wanted exemptions from city rules on government permitting, pollution controls, annexation, and taxes. “No one who knows Dukes’ reputation will be surprised to learn” that she received campaign contributions from the developer’s CEO, the paper wrote. “The council is wise to ignore shakedowns.”

For twenty years, Dukes had lived in that shadow land between right and wrong, between good government and what a member of the New York Tammany Hall gang once called “honest graft”—the pursuit of public interests and personal interests at the same time. As Tammany’s George Washington Plunkitt declared, “I seen my opportunities and I took ’em.”

Dukes’s world started crashing down after a 2013 car accident on Interstate 35, where she was rear-ended. She blamed constant pain from the accident for missing 85 percent of the votes in the 2015 Legislature. Then state staff members claimed she was paying them with taxpayer money while actually using them as nannies for her daughter. She defended the practice to the Texas Tribune by saying she provided the staffers with rent-free living. “I had a staffer who lived with me rent-free, and in exchange for living rent-free, they were being a nanny of sorts to my daughter,” Dukes said. “They were very close friends with her.”

The Texas Rangers began investigating whether Dukes converted state money to personal use, and over the summer she promised that, if she were reelected, she’d resign her seat in the Legislature. But last week, she reneged and took her oath of office for another two-year term. Dukes said she will stay in office while fighting the charges against her. That leaves her the option of possibly offering resignation as a bargaining chip for a lesser sentence. The end result, however, will be that her constituents had no voice in the Legislature last session and may not have one in the current one. Even if she resigns now, Governor Greg Abbott can delay for a month calling a special election and then another month would pass before it would occur. Half the session would be gone before Dukes’ seat could be filled.

The indictment against Dukes accuses her of converting campaign cash to personal use by taking two reimbursement checks from the Austin Area Urban League African American Community Heritage Festival and depositing them into an account for her own use. According to the American-Statesman:

The grand jury accused Dukes of converting to personal use campaign expenditures that were earmarked for the African-American Community Heritage Festival, an East Austin event Dukes co-founded 18 years ago but ended last year after negative attention caused by the investigation. Dukes has listed at least $17,600 in campaign expenditures for the festival, including $303 to an electronics store for “replacement of digital camera broken by staff,” $146 for Mardi Gras beads and more than $7,000 for musical performers, the Statesman investigation found.

The 13 charges for tampering with public records concern allegations that Dukes collected pay from the state during the 2014 legislative interim for days that she did not travel to the Capitol, which is required under House rules. The American-Statesman in May reported that a former Dukes staffer had accused the legislator of filing requests for per diem payments for days that she never traveled to the Capitol and may not have worked at all.

She is not the first to face this dilemma. Former Texas Attorney General Dan Morales spent time in federal prison for converting campaign funds to personal use by giving himself a short-term loan for the purchase of a mansion. State Representative Charles Staniswalis, an Amarillo Republican, pleaded guilty to filing false travel vouchers in 1990. Former El Paso Democratic Representive Bobby Valles served a short prison sentence after using state money to pay off a gambling debt. In the most high profile case, state Treasurer Kay Bailey Hutchison was indicted in 1994 on charges of using state employees to conduct campaign-related work for her, but she was acquitted when then-Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle declined to prosecute the case.

It now is up to the criminal justice system to determine whether Dukes broke the law or just engaged in politics as usual out there on the edge where backs are scratched, deals are done, and sometimes money lands where it doesn’t belong.

Related Content


    Paying legislators a decent wage might reduce the temptation but some people will abuse their office no matter what the salary. Dukes may well be one of them. She clearly did not understand that the office did not belong to her.

    • Gunslinger

      You only have to meet her a handful of times to know that she feels entitled to do whatever she likes.

      • WUSRPH

        I fully agree. I am actually her constituent but I have refused to vote for her since after her first term in the House. The tragedy is that this kind of a situation gives the JJ’s and the Trolls the leeway to start up with their “all of them are crooks, thieves and on the take” paranoid slander.

        • Gunslinger

          You hit on one of the things that I think most poisons the body politic: feeding the ego. If everyday you hear people (lobbyists, fawning constituents, special interests) telling you how smart you are, how you’re the best whatever, how you’re so great…well, pretty soon you’ll start to believe it.

          Pretty soon you don’t need to listen to anyone else’s idea because yours are the best. Everyone tells you so. You know what best for everyone. You keep winning elections. You know best what to do. You’re “SENATOR So-and-So” after all!

          In my opinion, the ego is also one of the reasons why rarely anyone ever chooses not to run again. They don’t want to go back to being a nobody. Who wants to go back to waiting in line again like a sucker?

          • WUSRPH

            Bullock said he realized the truth of the situation when the first Thanksgiving after leaving the Texas House came and he did not receive even one smoked turkey….Of course, when he became Comptroller he started the practice of sending people smoked turkeys….and I admit I had a strange feeling the first year I didn’t get one from him. When I started at the Lege a member might occasionally get his drinks “picked up” by a lobbyist and sometimes a meal…..but it was much more limited than it is now. Today I know of a member or two who has the staff call every day to let which lobbyist know where he expects to have dinner that night. And there was a state senator who had lunch delivered to his office for his staff every day with a group of lobbyists taking turns picking up the tab. As you note, it can have a very corrosive effect on people with easily inflatable egos. That is why I favor complete disclosure (member x eat on lobbyist y) for “entertainment”. It would probably result in a major decrease in that kind of behavior. You will find that many lobbyists and a surprising number of legislators think that is a good idea.

          • St. Anger

            this is why elections are the wrong way to choose leaders in a democracy/republic.

            elections attract all the sociopaths as candidates.

    • Mariaawaller

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !uw7c:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash369HomeDigitalGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!uw79c:….,……

  • John Bernard Books

    The entitled……

  • Mark Walters

    Well written and a great collaboration of Duke’s history in and out of politics.

  • John Johnson

    Don’t you just love politicians? The entitlement? The lies? The prostituted votes? Is it the power trip that trips them up? The knowledge that no one is really paying attention? Why do they refuse to pass congressional ethics laws with any teeth in them? Why do they fail to pass laws making it illegal to accept so much as a toothpick from special interests?

    Here’s the latest scoop on Mr. Obama’s biggest whoppers as posted by WaPo, but in no way covers all of them. Should it be illegal for any politician to knowingly spit out such crap to an ignorant, asleep-at-the-wheel, adoring crowd to politically get what you want? I’m sick of it.



    • John Bernard Books

      Straus blocked ethics reform last session. This is why failed, if it passed his base would be in trouble.

  • Jorge Jaramillo

    The Texas lege up to its shenanigans, every time it convenes it starts with indictments and charges the usual.