I have been corresponding with David Guenther of the Texas Public Policy Foundation on this issue. He used to work at the Workforce Commission, and he makes a couple of instructive points: Two alternatives to shore up the trust fund balance without relying on that set of funds (and strings): * A separate provision of the stimulus package provides zero-interest loans to states that need to shore up their UI trust fund balances. * In 2003, the Legislature gave TWC the authority to issue bonds to shore up its trust fund balance. It’s been a while since I looked at the testimony I wrote for Chair Rath, but I recall the interest rate being below 3%. (1.8% maybe?) Anyway, we prepaid those bonds ahead of schedule and saved $270 million as compared to other alternatives. A key angle that nobody’s talking about (yet) is that benefit projections are just that – projections. The more variables you add to an equation, the more the final results can vary – especially in a very fluid and unpredictable environment as we have now. If we address the trust fund balance by taking the $555 million, we may have a vague idea how much the additional benefits may cost over time but those estimates could wind up being wildly off. (Take a look at how much the October trust fund balance estimates bounce around.) But if we borrow the money through either of the alternatives I mentioned, we have a cost-certain impact on the trust fund and know exactly how employer taxes will be affected.
Get All Our Stories in One Daily Email
It’s free. It’s daily. And it’s full of great reads, y’all.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Email a link to this page