Schlitterbahn’s Tragic Slide

Jeff Henry often said that his goal in life was to make customers of his family’s legendary water parks happy—“to put a smile on their faces, to give them a thrill or two.” It was a beautiful vision. Until it went horribly wrong.

It was a Sunday afternoon, August 7, 2016, the temperature a pleasant 78 degrees, as ten-year-old Caleb Schwab began the 264-step climb to the top of Verrückt, the world’s tallest waterslide, which loomed like a colossus over the forty-acre Schlitterbahn Waterpark in Kansas City. Caleb was a brown-eyed boy, his nose dotted with freckles. He had come to the park with his father, Scott, a state legislator; his mother, Michele; and his three brothers. That day, Schlitterbahn was offering free admission to Kansas elected officials and their families, along with a buffet lunch, and the Schwabs, who lived in the town of Olathe, southwest of Kansas City, were thrilled. A free day at Schlitterbahn. What could be better?

The Kansas City Schlitterbahn is one of five Schlitterbahn parks in the country. The others are in Texas: in New Braunfels, South Padre Island, Galveston, and Corpus Christi. Every year, an estimated two million visitors go to the parks to plunge down slides, zoom through twisting tube chutes, and float and swim in man-made rivers and enormous pools. For the most devoted fans, Schlitterbahn is an aquatic version of Disney World, with something for everyone, from huge playgrounds for children to swim-up bars for adults that serve beer and margaritas. Some “Bahnophiles” spend every summer weekend, or even entire vacations, at a Schlitterbahn.

And in Kansas City, even those who cared little for water or who couldn’t afford Schlitterbahn’s $45 admission ($35 for children) would drive by the park just to get a look at Verrückt. At 168 feet 7 inches tall, Verrückt, which means “insane” in German, was taller than Niagara Falls. Three riders inside a rubber raft would plummet down a nearly vertical seventeen-story drop at speeds reaching up to 68 miles per hour. The moment they reached the bottom, they would shoot up a 55-foot-tall incline—the equivalent of a five-story building—before racing down one last steep slope, finally coming to a stop in a long, water-filled runout.


The 168-foot-tall Verrückt slide.

AP Photo/The Kansas City Star, Jill Toyoshiba

The idea for Verrückt came from 63-year-old Jeff Henry, who co-owned the Schlitterbahn parks with his older brother, Gary, and younger sister, Jana, and acted as the company’s chief visionary, a conjurer of splashy joyrides. In the water park business, Jeff was considered a genius of sorts—“an out of the box visionary of waterpark designs,” wrote Tim O’Brien in his 2006 book Legends: Pioneers of the Amusement Park Industry. Jeff often said that his goal in life was to make Schlitterbahn customers happy—“to put a smile on their faces, to give them a thrill or two,” he told me during one of our conversations this summer. “I’m a water showman. That’s what I do.”

And Verrückt, a ride that lasted only eighteen seconds, was considered to be his crowning achievement. When the slide opened to the public, in July 2014, riders’ reviews were a publicist’s dream. (“Most amazing ride I’ve ever ridden.” “Like dropping out of the sky.” “Terrifying and horrible and terrific.”) By the time young Caleb climbed Verrückt’s stairs, some 100,000 adrenaline junkies, a few of whom had flown in from across the world, had ridden Verrückt, and Jeff was planning to build a second version of the slide at the Schlitterbahn in Galveston.

According to park rules, a Verrückt rider had to be at least 54 inches (4 feet 6 inches) tall. Caleb was 4 feet 11 inches tall and weighed 72 pounds. He told his parents he had to try it.

Caleb Schwab Schlitterbahn

Caleb Schwab.

David Strickland

When Caleb reached the top of the platform, he could see the sprawl of Kansas City, including the downtown skyline, some sixteen miles away. He stepped into the front of the raft, and an employee secured him to his seat with a Velcro belt and a shoulder strap. Behind him were two young women—one 32 years old and the other 25—sisters who lived near the Kansas-Nebraska state line. It was quiet. The sounds of the park below—laughter and shouting—were nothing more than a faint murmur.

The gate swung open, and the conveyor belt underneath the raft began to move. The raft tipped forward. Suddenly, it was hurtling downward: it must have felt to Caleb as if he’d fallen off a skyscraper. Within a few seconds, the raft reached the bottom of the hill and swooped up the second, 55-foot hill. But instead of staying in its fiberglass flume and cresting the hill, the raft flew up into the air. Caleb’s head collided with a net and a semicircular metal hoop that arced over the top of the slide. The hoop sliced into his neck, and he was instantly decapitated. His head and body flew out of the raft and landed on the chute.

Waiting for Caleb at the bottom of Verrückt was one of his brothers, along with numerous spectators. As the boy’s small corpse slid toward the runout pool, everyone began to scream. Onlookers prevented Caleb’s mother from witnessing the scene. “It was as horrible a moment as you could imagine,” a person who was there told me. “A nightmare beyond comprehension. I can’t begin to describe it.”

Schlitterbahn Slides

Courtesy of Schlitterbahn Waterparks and Resorts; Retouching: Will Herwig

A half century earlier, in 1966, a Houston accountant named Bob Henry told his wife, Billye, that he was tired of city life. He said he wanted to raise their three children in a small town, just as he had been raised.

Leafing through a newspaper, Billye spotted an ad for a property called Camp Landa, a modest thirteen-acre campground with some sagging frame cabins that was for sale in the Hill Country town of New Braunfels, thirty miles north of San Antonio and fifty miles south of Austin. Bob, Billye, and the kids—Gary, Jeff, and Jana—piled into the family’s Ford station wagon and drove to the Landa to give it a look. The camp sat next to the spring-fed Comal River, which gently meanders two and a half miles through New Braunfels before merging with the Guadalupe River. Century-old cedar, oak, and cypress trees were scattered throughout the camp. A light breeze rattled the leaves. “This is paradise,” Bob said, and he struck a deal to buy the Landa that day.

The Henrys moved into a small house on the property, which they renamed the Landa Resort. Billye ran the cafe, and Gary, Jeff, and Jana did odd jobs: sweeping out the cabins, mowing the grass, laying brick, shingling, and grouting. To attract more customers, Bob erected two slides that dumped guests into the Comal.

“I always set out to break all the records. I want to be the first at the bar to buy a drink, and I want to be the first to meet a pretty girl, and I want to be the first at everything. I want to have the biggest, the tallest, and the fastest rides at my parks.”

Like his father, Gary, the eldest child, had a sharp, analytical mind. He would later attend the University of Texas and major in accounting. Jana, the youngest, would attend what was then known as Southwest Texas State University, in nearby San Marcos, and major in fashion merchandising. But Jeff, the middle child, wasn’t interested at all in a formal education. As a boy, he was the classic river rat, a Huck Finn in cutoff shorts who spent almost all his free time on the Comal. He swam, fished, canoed, rafted, and hunted for turtles. He pedaled his bicycle across town to buy busted car-tire inner tubes at gas stations, which he patched up and rented to tourists who wanted to float the river. He gave river tours, and he operated a petting zoo. “Thank you for bringing me here,” he once said to his dad. “This is the best life I could ever imagine.”

Jeff was so busy with his own projects that he barely had time to go to New Braunfels High School, and when he did, he often showed up for class barefoot. He was smart, and he joined the debate team, but he didn’t turn in his homework and refused to take tests, telling his teachers that tests were a waste of time. During his senior year, the school superintendent went to his father and said, “Bob, I have to be honest. We’re not sure how to handle Jeff.” According to family legend, the superintendent then handed Bob a diploma. “Tell Jeff we’re going to let him graduate so that he no longer has to come back to school.”

After high school, Jeff opened a video arcade bar in San Marcos that he called the Too Bitter Bar, the walls of which contained painted murals of moons, watermelons, lips, and bananas. He also kept working for his father. Around this time he noticed that some of the people going down his father’s slides were hitting the water too hard. So he invented what he described as a “water brake,” a dip at the end of the slide that slowed the guests down.

In  1977, when he was 22 years old, he took a trip with a buddy to Orlando, Florida, where he visited two newly opened water parks: Wet ’n Wild and Disney’s River Country. (At that point, there were fewer than a half dozen water parks around the U.S.) Jeff quickly got on the phone to tell Bob and Billye all about it. “He had the ability to see what other people were doing and then take that to the next level,” Gary told me. “And he saw before anyone else what we could do in New Braunfels.”

Schlitterbahn Henry family

From left: Jeff Henry with his father, Bob, mother, Billye, and siblings, Jana and Gary.

Courtesy of Schlitterbahn Waterparks and Resorts

Bob loved the idea of a water park. He bought a piece of property next door to the Landa, built a sixty-foot replica of a German castle (to reflect New Braunfels’s heritage), and had four blue fiberglass waterslides erected around the castle. He named the park Schlitterbahn, which means, roughly, “slippery road” in German, and hired his children to help him manage it. The quiet, efficient Gary oversaw the park’s buildings and finances; Jana handled the marketing; and Jeff was in charge of the attractions.

Schlitterbahn opened in 1979, drawing approximately five thousand visitors in its first season (the park is open full-time only from Memorial Day until Labor Day). For Schlitterbahn’s second season, Jeff added a 50,000-square-foot pool and an inner tube ride that he named the Hillside Tube Chute. In subsequent seasons, he built the Cliffhanger Tube Chute, the Tunnel Tube Chute, and the 45-minute-long Raging River Tube Chute. He encircled the park with a man-made river that behaved a lot like a real river, with light rapids, quick drops, and backwater eddies, and he filled the children’s playground with animal sculptures, telescopes, water cannons, giant sand buckets, and small slides that sent kids into shallow pools.

By 1990 Schlitterbahn had become a sensation, drawing nearly 500,000 people a year. Visitors loved the fact that they could park for free and bring their own food and drinks to the picnic areas. And, of course, they loved Jeff’s increasingly daring rides. On a 25-acre piece of property that the Henrys bought, three blocks east of the main park, he erected two rides that he had co-created with a former surfer turned inventor named Tom Lochtefeld.  The first was the Boogie Bahn, which allowed riders to actually surf on boogie boards over a thin, fast-flowing sheet of water that shot over a sloped surface. The second was the Dragon Blaster, a watery version of a roller coaster (a “water coaster,” Jeff called it), which used high-pressure jets of water to push tubers up and around chutes instead of just sending them straight downhill. Jeff came up with an artificial river that he called the Torrent River, where large waves unexpectedly rose and broke around the tubers. He later added another water coaster, the Master Blaster, that was six stories tall and filled with thrilling hairpin turns.

The ride quickly became the park’s most popular attraction.

Despite all his success, Jeff remained, at heart, a river rat. Bearded and scruffy, he almost always wore a dirty, creased ball cap, an old fishing shirt, shorts, and muddy boots. He drove an old truck. When he was in meetings, he pulled off his boots and propped his bare feet up on the table. He apparently enjoyed smoking pot. (In 1994 he pleaded guilty to third-degree felony drug possession after he was caught with seventeen ounces of marijuana.) And he was sometimes as obstinate with coworkers as he used to be with his high school teachers. “You could be in his presence for thirty minutes and leave disliking him immensely,” a water park consultant who worked with him told me. “He always thought he was right.”

Yet Jeff made no apologies. He said that if he was demanding and impatient, it was because he was consumed with making Schlitterbahn the best water park in the world. In a black notebook, he constantly wrote down ideas for new rides he wanted to build. To get even more ideas, he pored over the history of Roman aqueducts and leafed through Jules Verne novels. He never got a conventional education beyond high school and never formally studied physics or engineering. And that never worried the people around him. “That would be like someone being concerned that Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t have a college degree,” his brother told me. “The people that have a spark of genius don’t necessarily need college. Plus, Jeff always surrounded himself with other knowledgeable people who were able to do the numbers work that he wasn’t inclined to do.”

When he wasn’t working on Schlitterbahn rides, Jeff exported his inventions around the world. He sold his technology for slides and river systems to the Atlantis Paradise Island resort in the Bahamas and to the Palm in Dubai. In 1989, at a water park in Brazil, he created a 135-foot-high slide, called Insano, that at the time was the world’s tallest. (A single rider, lying on his back, shot straight down the slide, slowed during the long water brake, and finally came to a stop in a runout pool.) Industry veterans nicknamed him the Lord of the Slides and the Wizard of Wet.

“I always set out to break all the records,” Jeff told USA Today. “I want to be the first at the bar to buy a drink, and I want to be the first to meet a pretty girl, and I want to be the first at everything. I want to have the biggest, the tallest, and the fastest rides at my parks.”

Jeff Henry Verruckt Schlitterbahn

Jeff surveys his most extreme creation, Verrückt, shortly before it opens in 2014.

Charlie Riedel/AP

Had Jeff discovered his natural talents in almost any industry other than water parks, he might have had a harder time pushing the limits with his creations. But in the U.S., water park rides are not tightly regulated. Although the federal government’s Consumer Product Safety Commission has the authority to set safety standards for such products as baby cribs and bicycles, it has no authority to regulate water parks. That responsibility lies entirely with the states. Some states have agencies that inspect water parks; others rely on the parks’ own insurance companies to do inspections. Texas law, for instance, says that a park must obtain a $1 million liability policy for each of its rides and must have all rides inspected once a year by an inspector hired by the insurance company. But there is nothing in the law that requires the inspector to have any particular certifications. Nor does the law require an inspector to evaluate the safety of such factors as the ride’s speed or the geometric angle of its slide path. According to Texas Department of Insurance spokesman Jerry Hagins, the inspector is charged only with making sure that the ride is in sound condition and meets the “manufacturer’s specifications.” In other words, a water park is allowed to police itself.

Schlitterbahn initially seemed to be policing itself just fine. In 1998 the New Braunfels Schlitterbahn was named the country’s Best Waterpark in a poll conducted by Amusement Today. Sensing opportunity, the Henrys opened a Schlitterbahn in South Padre Island, in 2001. Jeff’s job was to fill the park with new attractions, and he didn’t disappoint. He devised a complicated artificial river system that moved tubers from one major slide to the next so they would rarely need to leave the water to stand in line.

In 2006 the Henrys expanded again, opening a year-round park in Galveston with a retractable roof. By then, developers from around the country who also wanted a Schlitterbahn were regularly approaching the Henry family with proposals. One of the most intriguing came from a Kansas City investor. He asked the Henrys to build a Schlitterbahn water park in Wyandotte County, Kansas, which covers the western half of metro Kansas City. The plans would eventually call for hotels, rental cabins, hundreds of thousands of square feet of retail outlets, and a residential area surrounding the park. To get the project going, a real estate investment trust offered to loan the Henrys $174.3 million. The State of Kansas also agreed to throw in an estimated $200 million in sales tax revenue bonds. These were Disneylike numbers. Schlitterbahn was entering the big leagues of American entertainment.

The deal was announced in 2005, but because of a drawn-out construction process, as well as the economic downturn of 2008, the venture had to be scaled back significantly, with no hotels, no homes, and little retail. When the park opened in 2009, expanses of dirt surrounded much of it. Industry insiders said the Kansas City Schlitterbahn needed a jolt—something big, really big—that would help it live up to the early hype and investment.

In October 2012, Jeff was at an amusement park industry trade show with his chief collaborator, John Schooley, a soft-spoken, silver-haired former yacht builder who had constructed slides at water parks in Asia before coming to New Braunfels to work for Jeff in 1998. The two men were approached by producers from the Travel Channel who said they were looking for an episode to lead off the new season of their popular TV series Xtreme Waterparks. They asked Jeff if he had any projects in the works.

Jeff, who has a streak of P. T. Barnum in him, suddenly blurted out that he and Schooley were going to build the world’s tallest and fastest waterslide at the Kansas City Schlitterbahn.

This was news to everyone, even at Schlitterbahn. For nearly a decade, Jeff and Schooley had been working on what they called a cannon nozzle: a highly pressurized water nozzle, much more advanced than the ones used in the Dragon Blaster and Master Blaster, that would propel riders up higher hills. They had no immediate plans to build a ride using the cannon nozzle, and certainly had no plans to build it in Kansas City, until Jeff made his pronouncement to the Travel Channel producers. “Something clicked in my head, and I just realized the time had come to do it,” he told me later.

He returned to Texas and met with Gary and Jana. (By this time, Bob had handed off the company to his three children, giving each of them a third of the voting shares.) He sketched out his plan for Verrückt: a one-of-a-kind slide that would not only send riders almost straight down a staggeringly tall hill but also shoot them up and over a second imposing hill, giving people multiple heart-stopping thrills. The slide would become the talk of the amusement park industry, he said. 

Gary and Jana agreed that Jeff should proceed with Verrückt. Soon, reporters from an array of media outlets—USA Today, Wired, ESPN’s Grantland, even Smithsonian magazine—were calling to ask Jeff about his latest adventure, and he was always ready with a good quote. He told one reporter that Verrückt was “an erotic piece of art” and would go down in history as “the most terrifying ride ever built in a water park.” He told another reporter that he had conceived of Verrückt because he could no longer tolerate the thought of the world’s tallest slide being in Brazil. (After he had created the 135-foot Insano, a Brazilian company built a body slide that was just under 164 feet.) “I’m from Texas,” he said later. “It was a matter of pride.”


Courtesy of Schlitterbahn Waterparks and Resorts; Retouching: Will Herwig

Jeff never made any secret of how he built his rides. As he told Legends author O’Brien, he relied on “trial and error, because no models of what was ‘supposed’ to be done existed at the time.” Sometimes he’d change his mind about a ride as he was building it and redesign it on the spot. If the completed ride still didn’t meet his expectations, he’d tear it down and start over. “You go back, you fix it, you make it work, you keep it safe,” he said.

To make Verrückt work, Jeff and Schooley (who also had no formal engineering credentials) and their staff were going to have to figure out the precise details of everything from the slope of Verrückt’s hills to the size of the rafts. They would need to determine what the minimum and maximum weights of the passengers in each raft should be, and they would need to find out what gravitational and centrifugal forces those passengers would be able to sustain. They would have to study such factors as the effect of water friction and even wind velocity on the rafts. And as if that wasn’t enough, they were going to have to invent a special conveyor system to transport the rafts back up to the top of the platform.

Although Jeff and Schooley said they used engineers and architects to help them design Verrückt, they also continued to depend on traditional trial and error. In a field near Schlitterbahn’s corporate headquarters, in New Braunfels, they constructed a small model of Verrückt, one twelfth the size of the real thing, and they sent a model car down the slide, along with cantaloupes and watermelons, to test it. They next built a ninety-foot-tall model of Verrückt (about half its eventual size), putting the initial drop at a 60-degree vertical angle, which they believed was steep enough for the riders to feel as if they were falling but was still gradual enough for the rafts to maintain solid contact with the chute. Followed by a camera crew from Xtreme Waterparks, Jeff and Schooley loaded a raft with sandbags and sent it down the slide. Everything went fine until the raft reached the top of the second hill. It lifted off the chute and went airborne, landing several yards away.

To slow the rafts’ velocity, Jeff and Schooley lessened the angle at the bottom of the initial drop. They then headed to Kansas City to build the 168-foot, 7-inch Verrückt. But with cameras still rolling, more sandbag-laden rafts continued to fly into the air. The Travel Channel crew asked Jeff why the slide was not working. “I’m not quite sure yet,” he replied. “There’s a whole bunch of factors that crept in on this one that we just didn’t know about.”

Verruckt Schlitterbahn

The view from the top of Verrückt.

AP Photo/Charlie Riedel

Whenever he did interviews for the TV show, Jeff seemed obsessed with Verrückt, as if it were his white whale. “Verrückt could hurt me; it could kill me. It is a seriously dangerous piece of equipment today because there are things that we don’t know about it,” he said at one point. “If we mess up, it could be the end. I could die going down this ride.”

Jeff told me later that he was making such statements only at the behest of the TV producers. “They wanted me to create suspense and danger, to make Verrückt look really scary to add drama to the show,” he said. “You know the [raft] that went airborne on our ninety-foot model in New Braunfels? It was faked. We added Rollerblade wheels to the boat to make it fly off.”

Maybe so (the Travel Channel declined to comment), but even if Jeff had been playacting for the cameras, there was something about Verrückt that bothered him. On April 25, 2014, Jeff climbed to the top of the Verrückt tower with Kansas governor Sam Brownback and officials from Guinness World Records, who proclaimed that Verrückt was indeed the tallest waterslide in the world. A few days later, Jeff ordered that two thirds of the slide be dismantled. It still wasn’t working, he said. Tests were showing that the rafts were going too fast and the g-forces were so powerful that passengers might pass out. (“Even an astronaut couldn’t handle it,” Jeff later told me.)

“Man, are they hitting that net up there? That boat flew. That boat looked like it flew.”

He and Schooley added an extra five feet of height to the second hill to slow riders down and decreased the angle of its descent. Finally, in June 2014, after several successful sandbag runs, they decided it was time for humans to ride it. Jeff, Schooley, and the brother of Jeff’s assistant piled into a raft. Jeff was wearing cowboy boots. “Well, man, if I don’t ever see you again, it’s been fun,” he said to Schooley, trying to be lighthearted. But at least one of the men was clearly nervous. “If you see a couple of people [go down the slide], you say it’s survivable,” Schooley later told a reporter. “But the first time, you don’t know. You really don’t know.”

On their first attempt, the cannon nozzle misfired, and the raft never made it up the five-story hill: it slid back down to the bottom. They walked up the stairs to try the ride again. This time, it worked perfectly. When they reached the runout pool, the three men in the raft shouted and pumped their fists in the air.

Over the next several days, more Schlitterbahn employees rode Verrückt without problems, and on July 10, after thirty months of work, the slide opened to the public. Numerous media outlets, including NBC’s Today Show and ABC’s Good Morning America, were there to capture the festivities.

People got in line to ride Verrückt. There was no age restriction—only the height requirement—so kids joined the line. The riders were divided into groups of three and ordered to step on a large scale. If the total weight of the three riders was between 400 and 550 pounds, they were sent up the stairs. At the top of the platform, they were weighed again and placed in a raft. An employee pushed a button, and the raft would take off.

That day, the Travel Channel’s cameras focused on Jeff and Schooley as they stood on an elevated platform near Verrückt’s second hill. During construction, the men had ordered that a net be placed above the chute, propped up every few feet by semicircular poles, to keep people from flying out. (The same netting system had been placed on Schlitterbahn’s Master Blaster rides.) As they watched one raft crest the hill, Jeff turned to Schooley and said, “Man, are they hitting that net up there? That boat flew. That boat looked like it flew.”

Once again, Jeff later insisted to me that he had been hamming it up for the camera and that he did not in fact see a raft fly off the chute on opening day. Indeed, for the next two years, there were no public indications that Verrückt had any problems at all. So many Schlitterbahn customers wanted to go down the ride that park officials began requiring them to sign up for time slots.

Then, on August 7, 2016, Caleb Schwab and his family arrived at the park.

At Caleb’s funeral at the LifeMission Church in Olathe, five days after his death, the grief among the mourners was overwhelming. Some of his baseball teammates sat in the front row, wearing their jerseys. At the end of the service, Caleb’s father asked the boys to gather at the front of the church and do a final huddle in honor of his son.

The Henrys made no public comment. All that came from Schlitterbahn was a statement from company spokesperson Winter Prosapio, who said, “We honestly don’t know what happened.” She added that Schlitterbahn was “deeply and intensely saddened for the Schwab family and all who were impacted by the tragic accident.”

Kansas City reporters began digging. They quickly learned that their state, like Texas, allows water parks to be self-inspected. (Under the headline “The making of Schlitterbahn’s Verrückt water slide: Too much, too fast?” a Kansas City Star article concluded that “the ultimate safety of [Verrückt] mostly began and ended with those inspired to build it.”) The reporters quoted former Verrückt riders who said their shoulder straps had busted loose or that their rafts had caught air. “Our boat one hundred percent went off the tracks,” one woman said. A local TV station interviewed a former park lifeguard who said Verrückt had terrified him and his coworkers.“We had to ride it three times before we actually opened the park every day,” Nathan Campbell said. “[Schlitterbahn managers] would ask lifeguards who would want to volunteer, and no one would put their hands up . . . It was like, ‘No, I don’t want to do it.’ ’’

Investigators and detectives from the Kansas City Police Department, the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, and the Kansas attorney general’s office also arrived at Schlitterbahn. A detective interviewed 29-year-old Tyler Miles, who had been working at the park since 2013 and had advanced from construction worker to lifeguard to director of operations, responsible for all aspects of the park’s day-to-day ride operations. “Have you been aware of any complaints regarding Verrückt the ride  in the last season?” the detective asked.

Miles answered, “I have not, sir,” according to the detective. His lawyers would later say he was so confident in the ride’s safety that on the very day that Caleb was killed, he had brought his wife to the park to ride Verrückt.

Investigators later learned, however, that Schlitterbahn employees were required to submit regular “ops reports” about the rides they monitored and, according to reports that the investigators read, Verrückt had problems that were never revealed to the public. For instance, eleven Schlitterbahn customers said they had been injured on Verrückt between August 31, 2014, and August 5, 2016 (two days before Caleb’s death). In five of the incidents, riders claimed they were injured while their rafts were still in the chute. (One rider reported that her head had slammed into the headrest and she sustained a concussion when her raft entered the runout pool at a high speed.) In five other incidents, riders claimed their rafts went airborne over the crest of the second hill and that they suffered head, neck, and back injuries when their rafts slammed back down onto the chute. And a man named Norris “J. J.’’ Groves reported that when his raft went airborne, his face and forehead struck the netting and a metal hoop, causing his right eye to swell shut for the rest of the day.

An investigator spoke to a seventeen-year-old lifeguard who said that Miles had ordered him to write a report that downplayed the severity of the Groves incident. Meanwhile, sifting through Verrückt’s maintenance reports, other investigators concluded that Miles had avoided or delayed making repairs that would have taken the ride out of commission. According to investigators, Miles hadn’t even ordered repairs when a Schlitterbahn manager informed him, on July 15, 2016 (three weeks before Caleb’s death), that maintenance work on Verrückt’s brake system was a priority.

What’s more, according to court documents, the investigators learned that on July 3, 2014, one week before the ride’s grand opening, an engineering firm hired by Jeff and Schooley to perform accelerometer tests on Verrückt’s rafts had issued a report suggesting that if the combined weight of the three passengers in a raft was between 400 and 550 pounds—the weight Jeff and Schooley had agreed was appropriate—there was a chance the raft would go airborne on the second hill. The ride opened anyway, with the weight range unchanged.

By 2017, attorneys for Schlitterbahn were meeting with the Schwab family’s attorneys. They eventually agreed that the water park and various companies associated with the design and construction of Verrückt would pay Caleb’s family a $20 million settlement, an astonishing sum. The two sisters who had ridden behind Caleb, both of whom suffered facial injuries, also received a settlement, of an undisclosed amount.

Still, neither Jeff nor his siblings offered any public explanation for what had happened. Had there been a problem with the distribution of the three passengers’ weight that caused the raft to lift off into the air? Had something gone wrong with the cannon nozzle that shot the raft up the second hill? Was the wind a factor? No one seemed to know, not even Jeff.

He said he wanted to return to Verrückt, which closed immediately after Caleb’s death but still loomed over the Kansas City landscape like some grisly monument, so he could find out what had gone wrong. His hope, he said, was to reconstruct the fatal ride exactly as it took place, assisted by a team of independent experts. But prosecutors for the Kansas attorney general’s office persuaded a judge to lock down the ride. They believed it was a valuable piece of evidence that should not be touched. Schlitterbahn was perhaps not the scene of a freak horrific accident, the prosecutors were saying, but the scene of a crime.

Courtesy of Schlitterbahn Waterparks and Resorts; Retouching: Will Herwig

This past spring, Kansas City prosecutors began meeting with a grand jury, and in late March, the jury issued indictments. When Jeff and Schooley erected Verrückt, the state charged, they had knowingly created a “deadly weapon.” Instead of using fundamental mathematical and physics calculations to design and build the ride, the two men had “rushed forward relying almost entirely on crude trial-and-error methods.” And although they realized that their finished product “guaranteed that rafts would occasionally go airborne in a manner that could severely injure or kill the occupants,” they went ahead and opened the ride anyway. To make matters worse, the grand jury charged, operations director Miles had deliberately concealed evidence about Verrückt’s dangers, going so far as to give a police detective false information.

Miles and the Kansas City Schlitterbahn itself were indicted for aggravated battery, aggravated endangerment of a child, interference with law enforcement, and involuntary manslaughter. Jeff, Schooley, and Schlitterbahn’s New Braunfels–based construction company, Henry & Sons Construction, were charged with aggravated battery, aggravated child endangerment, and second-degree murder, a much more significant charge than manslaughter that could result in sentences for Jeff and Schooley ranging from 9 to 41 years in prison, along with a $300,000 maximum fine per man.

Once again, Jeff and his siblings had no public comment, though Prosapio released another statement that said that Schlitterbahn was “shocked” by the indictments. “The allegation that we operated, and failed to maintain, a ride that could foreseeably cause such a tragic accident is beyond the pale of speculation. Many of us, and our children and grandchildren, have ridden the ride with complete confidence as to its safety . . . We run a safe operation—our 40 years of entertaining millions of people speaks to that.”

All the defendants pleaded not guilty in a Kansas courtroom. Before Jeff’s arraignment, his 39-year-old daughter, Amber, from his first marriage, raced to a Walmart and purchased a suit for her father to wear. He posted a $500,000 bond and surrendered his passport. As he walked out of the courthouse, his face ashen, a reporter asked if he had any training in engineering or physics. “No comment,” Jeff said. But one of his lawyers acknowledged that Jeff didn’t have such training. He added, “Neither did Henry Ford, and he built the car.”

Jeff returned to Texas and stayed out of public view, splitting his time between a condo he owns in South Padre and a home he owns outside New Braunfels on a remote piece of property a short walk away from the grave sites of his mother and father. (Bob died in October 2016, after a long illness, and Billye died in her sleep last year.) He stopped going to any of the Schlitterbahn parks he created, and the company laid off most of his design and construction staff. He endured another jolt of bad publicity when the news media learned about his marijuana use. (Besides the felony conviction in 1994, he was convicted in 2007 on a misdemeanor charge of possession.) Reporters from the San Antonio Express-News also revealed that in September 2013, Jeff’s second wife, Louise Settree, had claimed in divorce papers that he had “assaulted, battered, beat and tormented” her during their nearly five-year marriage and that his use of alcohol and drugs had contributed to the “horrific assaults.” His treatment of her, Settree claimed, was “so extreme in degree . . . as to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.” (Jeff’s attorney dismissed her accusations, claiming that such statements are common in contentious divorce proceedings.)

On June 16 of this year, after I’d attempted to contact Jeff a half dozen times through his legal team and his family, he called me at 1:26 in the morning. When I returned the call several hours later, just after 7 a.m., he picked up on the first ring. He sounded utterly distraught. “If I really believed I was responsible for the death of that little boy, I’d kill myself right now,” he said. He seemed close to tears. “There are members of my family who would like to commit me to a facility because I’m suffering from depression. Sometimes I can’t get out of bed for four days.”

He had decided to talk to me, he said, so that people would understand he had done nothing wrong. Over the next two days, we spoke four times, despite his lawyers demanding we stop. “How do you indict someone for murder if you don’t know what happened?” he asked at one point. “How is that possible?”

Jeff said that soon after Verrückt was up and running, he had left Kansas City to do some work on a Schlitterbahn park in Corpus Christi, which had opened in 2014, and he had never gone back. He said that he was never told about the eleven injuries on Verrückt prior to Caleb’s death, nor was he told about the 2016 maintenance problems. “If any raft had left the surface, that ride should have been shut down, and I would have gone straight there to figure out what was wrong,” he said. “But nobody bothered to tell me something was wrong with it.”

As for the outside engineering firm’s finding that a raft with three passengers weighing between 400 and 550 pounds could go airborne, Jeff said he thought it relied on outdated information. He also heatedly denied allegations that he had been worried about Verrückt’s dangers as he was building it, chuckling mirthlessly when he told me he’d been acting when he made his fearful on-camera comments, a few of which were quoted verbatim in the indictment. “The real Jeff Henry was not indicted. The actor Jeff Henry, who was trying to glamorize the ride, was indicted.”

Verrückt, he told me, “is the state-of-the-art technology. I thought we had designed the biggest, baddest thing ever built, a ride that could operate safely and never have a serious accident, ever, if things were complied with and if the thing was maintained and operated as designed. I’m telling you, the ride that was built by John Schooley and Jeff Henry is not the same ride that that boy was on the day he died.”

When the case goes to trial, which isn’t likely to happen for at least another year, Jeff’s and Schooley’s attorneys might use that very argument: that the employees who operated Verrückt made mistakes, such as ignoring maintenance problems, and that Henry and Schooley knew nothing about it. And the lawyers could argue that the two men were not criminally negligent. To have committed a crime, they would have had to have known that their actions could result in injury or death.

But prosecutors could tell the jury that Jeff and Schooley knew very well that Verrückt could lead to a catastrophe, yet they continued to push forward. Consumed with hubris, they were determined to be known as the creators of the tallest and fastest ride in all of water park history.

Schlitterbahn Park

Courtesy of Schlitterbahn Waterparks and Resorts; Retouching: Will Herwig

Schlitterbahn, meanwhile, is reeling. Plans to expand to other cities have been shelved. EPR Properties, the real estate investment trust in Kansas City that loaned Schlitterbahn $174 million for its Kansas park, has warned its investors that the criminal indictments could hurt Schlitterbahn’s chances of repaying its loan, which might force EPR to foreclose on the park, along with the parks in New Braunfels and South Padre Island, which had been put up as collateral for the loan. Last year a bank in Corpus Christi that held roughly $32 million in debt on that city’s Schlitterbahn took ownership of the park, after plans for an attached resort quintupled in size and  the project’s costs ballooned, eventually forcing the property into foreclosure. (Schlitterbahn continues to manage the park.)

“It’s a tragedy,” Jeff told me. “We were a Texas tradition, and now it’s over.”

When I later asked his brother, Gary, about Jeff’s comments, he quietly said, “It has been a horrific couple of years.” But he added that Schlitterbahn is not going out of business. (And he did get good news in July, when prosecutors agreed to let the company tear down Verrückt this fall.) “I get up every day and think about all the great people who work at Schlitterbahn,” he said. “I think about all the great customers who choose to come to a Schlitterbahn to spend their family vacations. I get fired up to come to work and take care of those customers.”

I recently drove to the original Schlitterbahn, in New Braunfels. It was a gloriously sunny afternoon, the kind tailor-made for Jeff’s innocent old vision of summer fun. Families poured through the gates. Children frolicked in watery playgrounds, teenagers lined up to ride the Boogie Bahn and the water coasters, and parents floated on the artificial rivers. I didn’t hear anyone mention the indictments in Kansas City.

I was hoping to meet Jeff, but he was still staying to himself. His daughter Amber did meet me. We walked past the home where Bob, Billye, and the Henry kids lived five decades ago (it’s now rented out to Schlitterbahn visitors). We stood on the bank of the Comal, where Jeff used to go swimming, and we ambled over to the first tube chutes that Jeff designed and built when he was a young man.

For a couple of minutes, I watched some kids zip down one of the chutes, grinning from ear to ear. I watched some other kids at a picnic table happily downing ice cream. I listened to the wind rustling through the cedar, oak, and cypress trees, and then I noticed Amber staring at me.

“It’s sort of beautiful, isn’t it?” she said. It was.


  • Coty

    This article was honestly a little disturbing to read because it kind of seems like you’re trying to make Jeff Henry and John Schooley out to be completely innocent. As responsible adults and OWNERS it was their jobs to check each business and monitor each location in order to find any and all issues, injuries or problems. If the staff didn’t tell them about certain things that is still in fact their responsibilities as the owners. A child died because of their mismanagement and wrecklessness in not utilizing any and all means necessary to ENSURE complete safety on each ride. Ages or weight limits should have been higher as a precaution. But that wasn’t thought through and the results were devastating. Henry said he did the interview for people to see he is completely innocent, but that definitely doesn’t seem to be the case. If he truly thinks that, he is in absolute denial. I hope you don’t actually think so too. You should go talk to the Schwab family and then revise this thing.

    • Llamas

      This 100 times over. I wonder how much the journalist may have been paid or otherwise benefited from authoring this article. Seems like a PR move in support of the company.

      • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

        no he just blundered into the Bahn paradox….not bad for an Aushlander….the 1991 vintage photos….the year New Braunfels high had a nephew of SS combat vet letter in cross-country…..

    • Mary Della Valle

      The problem is Verruckt was more about Jeff Henry’s ego than anything else, and the article proves this point. Math, physics, engineering do not matter in Henry’s world, only his ego. And the end results prove to be an extreme tragedy now that Caleb Schwab was killed on this ride.

  • Turnerpr

    This story would not be a “Story” if a legislators child was not the one injured. No, don’t miss the point, it was Still a huge tragedy but there would have been no charges, no nothing if it had been you or me.

    It came to be what is is, with charges and trials and accusations (he smoked marijuana? Oh NO!!), only because this child belonged to someone “important”. I live by the park, been there and know the details. You story missed that part sadly.

    • Llamas

      Is it a good thing that this only made the news due to it being a legislator’s child? Should this have been swept under the rug and ignored if it was someone else? Do you believe that the legal actions that have been taken are not just? I am not sure I understand your thought process from those comments but it comes off as if the tragedy should be ignored and let “bygones be bygones”…

  • worldtraveler007

    Not saying it wasn’t the owners’ fault, but there were multiple factors that attributed to what happened – mainly Caleb DID NOT meet the height requirement AND he was placed in the front of the two fatties (I read the sisters combined weight alone exceeded the weight limit). This made the raft unbalanced, so of course the front of the raft would lift up! At the very least if Caleb had been in the middle, the raft would have been balanced and not flown up at the front. Really the blame should go to whoever was supervising that ride at the time.

    • This Big Every Day!

      I thought Caleb was 5″ taller than the minimum required?

      • Janice Fulkerson

        It appears in the article that Caleb was five inches beyond the requirement. However, common sense would dictate that you’d want a weight-balanced boat when dealing with rough waters.

    • Pauline

      While reports from the incident were initially inconsistent regarding the weight of the two adults in the raft, the final investigation estimated the combined weight in the raft to be 545 lbs–just under the weight restriction. But “fatties”? Really?! Who uses language like that to describe two women injured and traumatized in an incident where surely no fault rested with them?

      • SuperTroll

        Fatties may be a harsh term, but facts are facts. Combined they weighed 545 lbs; minus a skinny 10 year old boy = they were obese. Or one of them was a cow!

    • Gregory Greer

      I suspect that it didn’t have as much to do with the raft being unbalanced as it did to do with not enough weight in the front. Maybe a bit of wind blowing in the opposite direction. The front lifted with the minimal weight and the wind caught it, causing it to fly.

    • S.Ryan

      Caleb was 5 inches taller than the required height, bigot.

  • Mac

    A very fair look at a tragic event. I appreciate the opportunity to make my own decision as to level of guilt, instead of feeling like I’m being led down a certain path. Well written.

  • SuperTroll

    I used to take my kids to the original Schlitterbahn back in the late 80s. It was great. Then it got too big, too crowded, too expensive and we stopped going. This is a classic story of hubris of the rich kid who thinks he earned his wealth. I would never get on a ride like that.

  • Ron Monteleone

    There is an arrogance about Jeff Henry and John Schooley that sadly, permeate through America today, that science and proper education is not required in society. Climate change? Why research it, why believe it when it will cost us jobs and money? Well, ignorance always costs us innocent lives in the end. What a tragedy. And to think it all could have been avoided with some proper education.

    • Llamas

      They had an assessment by independent engineers and still didnt listen. Classical example of criminal negligence.

  • Llamas

    This article reeks of the same language and hem-hawing taken with respect to gun violence. There is clearly a criminal negligence case here and I hope that those responsible are held accountable – from the designers, operation personnel etc. Blatant disregard for modern safety and engineering standards.

  • Eric Hernandez

    I liked the article. The sides were presented from the government’s point of view and from the builder’s point of view. Then you decide rather than being told what to think.

  • Gregory Greer

    100,000 people rode the ride. 11 got hurt and 1 died. Other than the one death, the injuries were not that significant. I wonder how that compares to football, or riding in a car. Criminal prosecutions? I am not in any way trying to minimize what a sad tragedy that death was, but accidents do happen. During the two years of operation of this ride, more than 60,000 people died in automotive accidents in the US, and only one died on this ride. Sure, the ride was supposed to be safe, but when you get into your car are you expecting to die? The park needs some accountability, but they already paid 28 million dollars. My opinion is that they are getting excessive on the penalties when they want to include extended jail time.

  • Thomas O’Brien

    Who are the architects and engineers who were consulted? My understanding was that no one did the heavy-duty math or structural analysis on the ride. One of these days, Texas will realize that an insurance inspector is not enough to make these rides safe. As the author notes, the states have a hodgepodge of regulations that apply to amusement rides. Kansas, for example, uses the state’s labor laws. If I have anything to say about it, my grandchildren are not getting on any of those rides until the owners post structural engineering reports and safety inspection reports at the entrance.

  • Horse Badorties

    Speaking of idiotic, not-engineering-based design, how ’bout that safety net? The very presence of the net presumes the possibility that the raft might go airborne, and that people will need to be physically constrained by the net. Okay so far, except that the net structure includes metal poles, inside (inflexible) and flush with the (flexible) netting surface. Meaning that, if the netting is ever needed at all for its actual intended purpose, human flesh would be colliding, at high speed, with those metal poles. Which is what happened. Completely, thoroughly boneheaded design, setting aside the design of the slide itself. Had the net been held in place by an external non-flush suspension structure, this still would have been an irresponsible ride design, but at least the “safety” net wouldn’t have been a decapitation hazard.

    • lngshirt

      The Net and supports were never part of the original design. They were put there by the assistants of state and local authorities before giving the OK for the slide to open. That is what this law suit and witch hunts about. People trying to focus the blame away from themselfs

      • Horse Badorties

        Yeah, it’s clear that no real thought went into the net design. “What might happen if the net ever needs to keep people from flying off the track” is a question that was never asked. The specification and design of the net is key here, because the net structure is what directly caused the death (yes, the raft flew up off the track, but the presence of the net presumed that that might happen sometimes). If it’s true that the net was “put there” by state and local authorities, then it still would have been someone’s job to design the net to be a safety feature rather than adding a deadly hazard to the ride that wasn’t there before; I seriously doubt that “assistants of state and local authorities” took on any kind of design role. Oh, and evidently, authorities were right (and the carnival barker ride designers were wrong) about the need for a safety net on this ride.

        • lngshirt

          The raft would have ( and did )come back down on the track. HAVE YOU EVER EVEN BEEN ON THIS RIDE? The nets and supports would never have kept the raft on the slide. A 400-pound raft with over 400 pounds of humans. Do the math genius. You have no clue of the construction or operation of this ride. You just need someone to blame for everything that happens in your life. New flash: accidents happen, people get hurt, Maybe we should blame Henry Ford for designing a machine that kills thousands of people a year.

          • Horse Badorties

            I have not been on the ride. But the results speak for themselves. Situating the metal structure of the safety net such that human heads would collide with the metal structure at high speed was a terrible, stupid design. Now, if you’re saying that Kansas bureaucrats were responsible for the design, then fine, that should shake out in court. But I’m guessing that Kansas “assistants” did not make the bad design; if they specified a safety net, then it was the responsibility of whoever designed the safety net for it not to be stupidly designed with fatal flaws. Just to be clear, a non-decapitating safety net design should have been doable, simply by suspending the net under tension, not unlike how some backpacking tents are made.

            Oh, and cool it, bucko. The only math I need to do is that there’s one (1) dead kid from a blatantly unsafe net design.

          • lngshirt

            Bucko? You speak from your ass. a big know nothing . And Yes the safety designs were specified and did state the construction of the safety nets. Thats why they were called Spec’s. You also know nothing about construction I see. As I have stated original this witch hunt is covering up the fact the bureaucrats got involved in the design of something they knew nothing about. A child lost his life and the citizens will wind up losing a water park.

          • Horse Badorties

            What’s telling about your increasingly rude personal attacks against me here, is that you aren’t even trying to refute my main point, which is that, setting aside the ride itself, the safety net design was shoddy and dangerous.

            As I said, if bureaucrats took responsibility for the design, as you claim, then it’s on them, and that will be established in court. It isn’t me you need to convince here.

          • K “JenksPackers!” E

            Sounds like a lot of emotion here…. but just wanted to add that I believe the laws of force and momentum would indeed keep the raft on the same forward motion trajectory with or without the nets. it’s the same principle as to why a bicycle or motorcycle can ride super fast once the wheels are spinning – an object in motion has air forces helping it stay in motion from the sides in particular (sorry, I haven’t looked up the science in a while – a demo was done at one of my kids’ science fairs – not related to this). So… other then looking like they were there for safety there is little the nets would have done for actual safety other then if someone flew out of a raft. Otherwise, the raft would have landed back down in the flume.

          • Horse Badorties

            > “I believe the laws of force and momentum would indeed keep the raft on the same forward motion trajectory with or without the nets”

            Actually, no.

            Or, yes, if you ignore the forces from moving air. (Bear with me here; this stuff is interesting…) You’re right that momentum forces would keep the raft on or above the track. In fact, still ignoring air forces, and given that nearly all people don’t fly up from the track, the raft should stay on the track quite consistently, since the effective upward acceleration near the track hump’s apex is a function of the same object weight that pulls the object down, so less body weight means proportionally less upward momentum force. The front of the raft did lift up, though, and that has to be because of the air forces that are added to the mix.

            The trouble with air forces here is that once the rapidly oncoming air lifts the front of the raft up a little bit, that allows *more* air to flow under the raft, which *increases* the forces upon the raft’s bottom surface, which is now acting like a wing, which then allows even more air, which increases the lift yet more. AND, if, for whatever reason, say, the left side of the raft lifted up more than the right, the left side will then have more upward pressure, which will lift the left side even more compared to the right side. And once that happens, you’ve got a left-ward force vector acting on that wing. In other words, if the raft rises initially more to one side, it’s going to want to fly off towards the other side.

            Which isn’t to say that would have happened here. It may well be true that the heavier riders in the back of the raft would have kept the raft from flying off the track. But having described TWO different unstable equalibria in the above paragraph, at least one of which definitely occurred in the fatal accident, that’s not a scenario that I would have bet other people’s lives on.

          • K “JenksPackers!” E

            Interesting for sure. So you’re thinking the raft would have flipped over and perhaps landed upside down (potentially) once it got lift because in this case there were two heavier people in the back and lighter in the front.

            Will be interesting what role the nets play in the claim that the designers were reckless. I still wonder, aside from the trajectory and weight and all – what the helk were they thinking with the nets and cross bars at that speed?

          • K “JenksPackers!” E

            just had another thought, I bet the heavier back riders would have kept the raft in the flume side to side I can’t imagine it getting enough lift to come completely out of the flume. so in that case, I guess the biggest physics risk was indeed the flip… which may have been ‘safer’ in this case then the netting with bars.

            I’ll have to read the indictment again, I think there was something about the safety belt as well here though.

          • S.Ryan

            You made the personal attacks here.

          • Neer NFar

            my heart breaks for the family that lost a child. don’t care what you say.

          • lngshirt

            Have sympathy its great you do. I have sympathy But to have knee jerk reaction because something makes you sad is ludacris.

  • Philip

    The moral of the story: don’t ever do anything that might be even remotely fun or potentially dangerous- and even if YOU do, don’t let anyone else pay you to try it- especially if they have important parents!

    • Conuly

      You can have fun without risking people’s lives.

      • Philip

        That’s true. It’s also true that freak accidents happen- even when you are just trying to have fun. There are twenty million good reasons why the authorities should leave the slide designer alone. If it was a lethal weapon, why was it allowed to exist in the first place? The media seemed to love it where were they to warn the public about the danger? Waterparks are dangerous places by default. People die at waterparks. Life is risky. That’s what makes living interesting.

        • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

          sorry dude Roller coasters are scientifically designed…..done with load factors….yeah I have seen shoes fall off and fall down from the steel eel not humans. Harnnes are designed. Fear of a lawsuit did not work. A freak accident is by definition something unforeseeable this accident is like Oscar Diaz’s last fight checks and balances where not not followed.

          • Philip

            There is no need to apologize. It is ok to disagree. I do appreciate your respectful perspective. Water parks are slippery when wet. The one near me shut down years ago because of a similar unforeseen tragedy. I remain certain no one intended for the accident to have happened only because of its totally ruinous financial nature.

          • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

            You and I have a different definition of for seeable. There where alterations made on White Water because people where dinging their head (cuts mainly) on it as they crossed under a concrete bridge feature on which a life guard sat. This was in the 80s. A lawyer could have been mindful I remember park employee being a test dummy on a ride of one the buildings pictured less than an inch of air..and how the ride was being tweaked (when I was an employee near mid season). Those rides where on a much SMALLER a certain point one expects professional ride design on a massive ride one expects the science to be done like it is done on a rollercoaster. PARK GUESTS PAY FOR THRILLS NOT REAL DANGER on rides. Water had very little to do with this this was a ROLLER COASTER. Admittedly there is a hazy line at times between park liability non swimmers drowning in deep water, heat injuries (stroke and heat exhaustion) take HS senior or college freshman put them in retail with access to ice, water and cups, while sellilling bottled water they will be inclined to see the cup and ice and tap water as loss and scold a subordinate for suggesting it. A park medic would call it PREVENT DEFENSE and prevention of other losses.

  • Rotten Girl

    This wasn’t a freak accident – it’s easy enough to conclude that putting the lightest person up front on a 3 person float is going to put more force on the back and push the raft upwards like it was popping a wheely. Idiots.

  • ABMK

    I see his ability to avoid accountability and cut corners happened early.

    “Jeff was so busy with his own projects that he barely had time to go to New Braunfels High School, and when he did, he often showed up for class barefoot. He was smart, and he joined the debate team, but he didn’t turn in his homework and refused to take tests, telling his teachers that tests were a waste of time. During his senior year, the school superintendent went to his father and said, “Bob, I have to be honest. We’re not sure how to handle Jeff.” According to family legend, the superintendent then handed Bob a diploma. “Tell Jeff we’re going to let him graduate so that he no longer has to come back to school.”

    • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

      Its a New Braunfels thang….I wonder if the superintendent’s name was Charles Bradberry. Then again how many school board members where owned by the Henry family the way Johnny Manzel’s dad owned Kerrville ISD school board. Perhaps family legend means administrators tried but where powerless so in exasperation . I can name drug addicts from that town same academic experience as the Henry kid. The town that gave us Six Pence gave us this. Having went to both Denton and New Braunfels one incident in Denton (the treatment of assistant superintendents son en route to his last photo shoot as yearbook staff) would have created a scandal….he was treated like a normal student and had complied with school rules…the principal was DOING JOB PROPERLY. I can hear New Braunfels reasoning now he was Anita’s kid, he was not makin noise, he was a senior. I can hear Denton reasoning “He was in the hall last period he had a hall pass he was treated like everybody else” proof is in output….

  • Authorized User

    Ten of thousands of people went down the ride in a period of two years and there were only 11 unrelated incidents reported. This is proof that this extreme thrill ride was safe.

    • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

      What conditions where in common in those accidents, what conditions where in common with the safe operation? HOw where those rafts that operated safely loaded vs the loading on the raft that day?

  • Allan Folsom

    Bravo Skip. Once again an exceptional piece of Journalism. Texas Monthly at its best.

  • BC

    I thought this was a well-written article; but the photographs were not up to the quality of the writing.The “retouching” of the park-supplied photographs added nothing of value and seemed to consist mostly of randomly applying flares of color in order to make the pictures look older. Better illustrations would have elevated this article from good to great.

    • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

      The photographs circa 1991 where predigital and the sunlight flares are consistant with light conditions in that section of the park. I think they are well chosen because they are of era before Camp Warnacke was taken over….indicative of the birth of the beast that swallowed New Braunfels.

  • K “JenksPackers!” E

    I thought the article was fair enough. Still makes me wonder if / how much criminal intent is really there and why the state of KS decided to go that route. Seems like the Maintenance Chief is going to take the fall here unless KS can prove he routinely reported the brake issues to the owners and they declined to fix.

    Otherwise, people can say what they want about the design process and all, 100,000+ people rode the ride safely, I think there’s a decent case to throw the Maintenance guy under the bus but not the designer – again, unless KS can prove some conspiracy that the designers and owners were willfully denying proper maintenance on the ride to keep it open.

    Guess at the end of the day, we shall see in the court trial what comes out and whether the state of KS ends up with egg on their face for pursuing criminal when a civil settlement had already been reached.

    • St. Anger

      “negligence” doesn’t require criminal intent. or any intent. that’s what negligence is.

      • K “JenksPackers!” E

        negligence = civil; intent tips it to criminal, in this case the prosecutor creating a strong link to willful, intentional vs the maintenance director was not doing their job on a day to day basis (unless there’s a link in the evidence to bring the two together into willful). But linking failure of the ride to perform correctly to the owners vs the operations staff (head maintenance people(s) and whoever loaded the raft…) is going to be difficult in court unless KS can prove and that’s the link to the owners / designers though evidence. It would be like charging a car manufacturer with criminal murder / manslaughter on a car accident when the operator didn’t properly maintain the car with new tires, etc.

        So I dunno on the whole prosecution but we’ll all see.

        • St. Anger

          criminal negligence = criminal

          • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

            or get me sued for violating a piece of paper I signed spring of 01. Jeff Henry more than likely had Mr Skarosky as his physical science and physics teacher New Braunfels High School…Skarosky is legend whose teaching methods were at times far from orthodox incredibly effective…the cowboy physicist…who looked like a bowlegged cartoon cowboy. The lecture Jeff Henry would have done well to remember or show up for the difference between man laws and physical laws….. Physical laws are immutable no good lawyer or family connection can get you away from there effects.

          • K “JenksPackers!” E

            you may have the last word on definitions, no prob.

            Just sayin’ – the indictment is thin, to the level of non-existent in linking the designers to the ongoing poor maintenance in 2016 and the Head Maintenance guy is going under the bus for this regardless of how anyone feels about Henrys or how they roll. The designers will drive home that issues during the design process were fixed, 100,000 rode safely, they didn’t know about safety concerns, would have shut it down in that case to fix, etc, etc, etc and KS is going to spend a million or two on criminal (knowing well enough civil has already settled at over $20M)… and/or it will end up in pleas to lessor counts before it goes to trial, and unfortunately for the family none of this will bring back their son. And who knows if Jeff Henry will have actually learned his lesson.

            So… I continue to ask myself, at this phase… who (KS Attorney General or Schlitterbahn owners) are the ones trying an experimental process that is highly likely to fail – all with lots of risk but with high profile rewards if they succeed and lots of egg on the face if they fail? So again… why criminal? the civil court system has already settled this. But as I also write, we shall see… I’m personally open to hearing out what happens in court and open to seeing it a different way.

      • K “JenksPackers!” E

        there’s a post yesterday by Estaban that is interesting in this arena. that’s where I think how that plays out in court will tip it one way or other.

      • Jenny Robertson Johnson

        right. if you knew better it would be wanton negligence.

  • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

    I have worked Schlitterbahn New Braunfels and Sea World. I grew up in New Braunfels attended NBHS till 1/3 into my sophomore year. Some thoughts who you are in New Braunfels meant what you could get away with in school and out….hubris….. and tragedy. Rules did not quite apply to the Henry family the way they applied to non stars non affluent kids. Rules are for reality does not apply especially if your parents are loaded. HOw much of this hubris played out. The park is beast we created working 2001 it came clear how much of the endearing aspects of the town my paternal grandparents thought would be happily ever after their Latvian Diaspora journey dominated the park. Employee café provided culinary memories recipies from fallen eateries. One night a swat (15 year old limited duty employee) was talking about testing adjustments made on a ride due to weight less feel coming airborne by milimimeters and ability to stop at the pool. that he got to test out. This article put into context that discussion. Sea World was clinical not without its safety issues (park employee fatally electrocuted after I left) local news pointed out how park director found different employment after that lawsuit. I also know a whole crew of ride operators and ride manager were fired after a post close ride on a coaster without seat belts only harness. The incident was caught quickly people where fired. Henry family dominated NB and rules for

    • K “JenksPackers!” E

      that’s interesting, will be interesting in court

      • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

        Normally I loathe Texas Monthly on political issues.. this article though is good. It approaches and describes accurately …the essence of the issue….. of the death and the Henry family. Had Texas Monthly been on the ball 1990s-2005 they could have written about the complex hate love relationship between New Braunfels and Schlitterbahn….that thing of ours! God knows how much I miss walking by the river to the employee lot watching the fish and turtles after a stressful day….at the Bahn….better then a couple beers to calm down after a shift. Well written well researched article…..just keep in mind….this story and Six Pence NTR are aspects of the same town.

        • K “JenksPackers!” E

          in my life experience, growth and risk taking go hand in hand and what you’ve described throughout your posts definitely reflects that. it’s why Neal Armstrong went to the moon and others said it couldn’t be done. if you’ve never read it, Malcolm Gladwell’s ‘David and Goliath’ is a great read about people such as the Henry family who are contrarians. Mr Henry is obviously a contrarian visionary and that’s not so popular in 2018 where everyone is into risk management over risk taking – whether that rises to criminal negligence or criminal recklessness is what makes me pause a bit. But as I have been posting, it will play out either before court or in court. Appreciate your perspectives greatly.

          • Esteban Erik Stipnieks

            As one who has boxed and one has aviated I understand risk taking. When he was tearing up New Braunfels high school my father was putting OH-58s in 90 degree banks on occasion. There is a line which by God’s grace I avoided consiquences that I have crossed between risk taking and stupidity. Flying Within 20 nm of thunder storms, running though sick a week of race as a cross-country runner and even stupidly as a employee at Sea World in an epic dances with heat exhaustion spring break 2004. Notice whose butt was endangered….not a park guest. It is one thing for an aviator who knows about a V-tail Bonanza to take one up voluntarily it is another park guests who ride thrill rides pay for thrills not risks .

    • K “JenksPackers!” E

      They sound interesting, much like Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, etc. this type of people often rule supreme over their respective kingdoms in any given arena.

  • Go Down, Moses

    What a beautiful boy. Somewhere, the ghost of Kelly Ogle is shaking his head in sorrow.

  • James

    How on earth are waterparks allowed to self-regulate?! Who does that benefit other than the waterpark owners? And, frankly, they didn’t do anywhere near enough to protect their patrons. Especially with something like that. They should have had that thing reviewed by third-party engineers constantly. “Oh, they didn’t tell us.” You also weren’t asking and checking yourself. Clearly, the experience and the accolades far outweighed safety. They were living in a fantasy world if they thought they were sufficiently looking out for people’s safety in their parks. They likely didn’t know that they were presenting a danger, but they clearly didn’t care to know either. There’s a reason we have regulations and reviews and oversight. Despite the best of intentions, people need checks and another set of eyes and someone upholding a standard to protect everyone.

    • S.Ryan

      Its Kansas.

      There are many there still po’d about Brown v Board of Education decision.

  • Mark Machado

    Sucks. Now every ride is going to over regulated and boring. Dude sounds like a douche but at least he made some good rides.

    • raider

      would you have that attitude if it were one of your children that was decapitated?

      • Mark Machado

        I would riot in the streets and burn down buildings!! Water Slides lives Matter!!